VS

Nissan Ariya vs Audi Q4 e-tron comparison

Compare performance (435 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (54,800 £ vs 40,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Ariya or Audi Q4 e-tron?

Nissan Ariya vs Audi Q4 e-tron: Key differences

Nissan Ariya

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • noticeably more electric range
  • moderately lighter
  • visibly more trunk space
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ariya

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Audi Q4 e-tron is noticeably cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the Nissan Ariya costs 54,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,134 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 24.5 kWh/100km for the Nissan Ariya. That’s a difference of about 9.7 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 175 km more than the Nissan Ariya.

Q4 e-tron

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Ariya offers markedly more power – delivering 435 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 95 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Ariya is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 5 s, while the Audi Q4 e-tron takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers somewhat more torque with 679 Nm compared to 600 Nm. That’s about 79 Nm more.

Ariya

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q4 e-tron is moderately lighter – 2,035 kg compared to 2,277 kg. The difference is around 242 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers visibly more boot space – 535 L compared to 415 L. That’s a difference of about 120 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q4 e-tron carries noticeably more – 515 kg compared to 363 kg. That’s a difference of about 152 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q4 e-tron stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,700
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 440 - 592 km
Nissan Ariya
Audi Q4 e-tron

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Nissan Ariya

The Nissan Ariya wraps futuristic, sculpted styling around a calm, high-tech cabin, making the switch to electric feel surprisingly easy and grown-up. It’s a comfortable, sensible EV that favors everyday usability and clever packaging over headline-grabbing theatrics — ideal for buyers who want an elegant, low-fuss electric car without the ego.

details

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details
Nissan Ariya
Audi Q4 e-tron

Costs and Consumption

Price
54,800 £
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
24.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
417 km
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,277 kg
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Trunk capacity
415 L
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,850 mm
Width
1,865 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
363 kg
Payload
505 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
435 HP
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
320 kW
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Audi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.