Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Nissan Interstar vs Ford Tourneo Connect comparison
Compare performance (170 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (36,200 £ vs 27,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Interstar or Ford Tourneo Connect?
Nissan Interstar vs Ford Tourneo Connect: Key differences
Interstar
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Tourneo Connect is visibly cheaper – starting at 27,300 £ , while the Nissan Interstar costs 36,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,817 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Tourneo Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Nissan Interstar with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 7 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Nissan Interstar offers clearly more range – reaching up to 410 km, about 291 km more than the Ford Tourneo Connect.
Tourneo Connect
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Interstar offers a bit more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 20 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Interstar delivers barely more torque with 380 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Tourneo Connect offers more seats – 5 vs 3.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Tourneo Connect is clearly lighter – 1,542 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 511 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries considerably more – 1,447 kg compared to 818 kg. That’s a difference of about 629 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Tourneo Connect holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,300
Ford Tourneo Connect
Nissan Interstar
Ford Tourneo Connect
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Nissan Interstar
The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.
details
Ford Tourneo Connect
The Ford Tourneo Connect is a practical, surprisingly polished people-mover that balances family-friendly flexibility with car-like driving manners. With clever storage, sliding doors and a bright, airy cabin it’s a smart choice for buyers who want sensible versatility without sacrificing everyday comfort — and it’s oddly enjoyable to drive for its size.
details
Nissan Interstar
Ford Tourneo Connect
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
|
Price
27,300 - 41,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
410 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 205 g/km
|
co2
11 - 164 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
3
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
|
Curb weight
1,542 - 1,781 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
1,213 - 1,720 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,080 mm
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg
|
Payload
563 - 818 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.