VS

Nissan Interstar vs Skoda Octavia Combi comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (36,200 £ vs 25,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Interstar or Skoda Octavia Combi?

Nissan Interstar vs Skoda Octavia Combi: Key differences

Nissan Interstar

details

Skoda Octavia Combi

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • a bit more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Interstar

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Octavia Combi is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,600 £ , while the Nissan Interstar costs 36,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,582 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Octavia Combi uses 4.4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Nissan Interstar with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 3.1 L/100km.

Octavia Combi

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers a bit more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Interstar delivers barely more torque with 380 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Skoda Octavia Combi offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Octavia Combi is clearly lighter – 1,366 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 687 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries significantly more – 1,447 kg compared to 534 kg. That’s a difference of about 913 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Octavia Combi holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,600
Octavia Combi

Skoda Octavia Combi

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.4 - 6.9 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Octavia Combi
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
The Skoda Octavia Combi and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports are two of the most practical estate cars on the market, each promising roomy cabins and sensible running costs for families and commuters. This comparison focuses on cargo space, fuel efficiency, driving dynamics and overall value to …
Skoda Octavia Combi
Volvo V60
VS
We’re comparing the Skoda Octavia Combi and the Volvo V60 — two popular estate cars that appeal to buyers who need space and everyday usability without sacrificing comfort. Commonly called the Octavia Combi and the Volvo V60, they take different approaches: Skoda focuses on maximum practicality and …
Nissan Interstar
Skoda Octavia Combi

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Interstar

The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.

details
serpimg_9dGXeC

Reviews Nissan Interstar

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Octavia Combi

The Skoda Octavia Combi is a practical, well‑packaged estate that delivers generous and flexible interior space ideal for families or active owners. Its sensible cabin layout, comfortable ride and solid reputation for reliability make it a pragmatic choice for buyers who value utility over flash.

details
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_Dynamisch_116407
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_Dynamisch_116406
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_Dynamisch_116402
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_e_TEC_116372

Reviews Skoda Octavia Combi

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Roberto
25 May 2026, 05:05:18

Una gran elección para autopista

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Roberto
25 May 2026, 04:58:36

Tiene mucho más espacio por menos dinero

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Andrzej
12 May 2026, 15:17:48

Great car with a dynamic 1.5 engine and a 7-speed automatic; a downside is the electronics, which often shut off—terrible when reversing!!! It could also have a bigger tank because it averages 7 liters and at most 700 km.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Octavia Combi
Skoda Superb Combi
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Octavia Combi and the Skoda Superb Combi comes down to whether you want a sharper-value, practical family estate or a near-executive wagon that prioritizes space and refinement. Both offer huge carrying capacity, efficient engines and sensible equipment, but the Octavia …
Nissan Interstar
Renault Master Transporter
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Interstar and the Renault Master comes down to balancing payload, practicality and running costs for light commercial use. This comparison will cover cargo capacity, engines, fuel economy, driving comfort and ownership costs so you can pick the van that best fits your …
Skoda Octavia Combi
VW Golf Variant
VS
If your shopping list includes a boot that can swallow flat-pack furniture and weekend sports equipment without complaint, the Skoda Octavia Estate is the sensible giant with massive practicality and smart value, while the VW Golf Estate packages similar underpinnings into a neater, more refined …
BMW 3 Series Touring
Skoda Octavia Combi
VS
The BMW 3 Series Touring and the Skoda Octavia Estate are both practical estate cars, but they target very different buyers: the 3 Series Touring delivers sharper handling, a premium interior and stronger brand cachet, while the Octavia Estate prioritises interior space, low running costs and sheer …
Kia Sportage
Skoda Octavia Combi
VS
In the battle between the Kia Sportage and the Skoda Octavia Combi, each model brings its own strengths to the table. The Sportage offers a bold design and a spacious interior, making it a strong contender for families and adventurers alike. Meanwhile, the Octavia Combi impresses with its superb …
Skoda Octavia Combi
Skoda Scala
VS
Skoda Octavia Combi and Skoda Scala go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Skoda Octavia …
Skoda Octavia Combi
Kia K4
VS
Comparing the Škoda Octavia Estate (commonly called the Octavia Combi) with the Kia K4 pits a spacious, practical wagon against a compact, value-focused sedan, each aimed at buyers who prioritise different kinds of everyday usability. This short head-to-head will focus on space, driving character, …
Kia Ceed Sportswagon
Skoda Octavia Combi
VS
Family-hauling face-off: the Kia Ceed Sportswagon serves big spec, a sweet drive and a long warranty for hatchback money, while the Skoda Octavia Estate counters with limo-like rear legroom, a cavernous boot and a more polished ride. If you prize value and low running costs, pick the Kia; if space, …
Nissan Interstar
Skoda Octavia Combi

Costs and Consumption
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
Price
25,600 - 39,600 £
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
410 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 205 g/km
co2
113 - 157 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
Estate
Seats
3
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
Curb weight
1,366 - 1,553 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
640 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,080 mm
Width
1,829 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg
Payload
502 - 534 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Power HP
116 - 204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 10.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Torque
220 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, C
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Skoda
Is the Nissan Interstar offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.