Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Nissan Qashqai vs Land Rover Range Rover - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (205 HP vs 615 HP), boot space and price (29600 £ vs 122700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Qashqai or Land Rover Range Rover?
Qashqai
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Nissan Qashqai has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29600 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 122700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 93137 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover manages with 2.70 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Nissan Qashqai with 4.50 L. The difference is about 1.80 L per 100 km.
Range Rover
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover has a convincingly edge – offering 615 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 410 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.50 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.60 s. That’s about 3.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover performs distinct better – reaching 261 km/h, while the Nissan Qashqai tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 55 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover pulls convincingly stronger with 800 Nm compared to 330 Nm. That’s about 470 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Qashqai
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers noticeable more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is significantly lighter – 1420 kg compared to 2504 kg. The difference is around 1084 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers noticeable more room – 818 L compared to 504 L. That’s a difference of about 314 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Land Rover Range Rover performs noticeable better – up to 2176 L, which is about 729 L more than the Nissan Qashqai.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover distinct takes the win – 846 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 326 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Land Rover Range Rover is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Nissan Qashqai
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £122,700
Land Rover Range Rover
Nissan Qashqai
5 (1 Reviews)
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
Land Rover Range Rover
The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.
details
Nissan Qashqai
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29600 - 39900 £
|
Price
122700 - 244700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
116 - 117 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
31.80 kWh
|
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
co2
62 - 265 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 - 90 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
|
Curb weight
2504 - 2810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
|
|
Length
4425 mm
|
Length
5052 - 5258 mm
|
|
Width
1835 mm
|
Width
2047 mm
|
|
Height
1625 mm
|
Height
1870 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1841 - 2176 L
|
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Payload
589 - 846 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
Power HP
300 - 615 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
218 - 261 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
Torque
650 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
Power kW
221 - 452 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2997 - 4395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Is the Nissan Qashqai offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.