Compare performance (130 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (25700 £ vs 22900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Townstar or Peugeot Rifter?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Peugeot Rifter has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 22900 £ , while the Nissan Townstar costs 25700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2845 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Peugeot Rifter manages with 5.40 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Nissan Townstar with 6.70 L. The difference is about 1.30 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Peugeot Rifter: with 18.30 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Nissan Townstar with 19.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1 kWh.
As for electric range, the Peugeot Rifter performs to a small extent better – achieving up to 339 km, about 58 km more than the Nissan Townstar.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot Rifter has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 136 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 6 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot Rifter is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 11.30 s, while the Nissan Townstar takes 12.60 s. That’s about 1.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Nissan Townstar performs distinct better – reaching 183 km/h, while the Peugeot Rifter tops out at 132 km/h. The difference is around 51 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Peugeot Rifter pulls slightly stronger with 300 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.
In curb weight, Peugeot Rifter is minimal lighter – 1498 kg compared to 1509 kg. The difference is around 11 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Peugeot Rifter offers distinct more room – 1050 L compared to 775 L. That’s a difference of about 275 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Peugeot Rifter performs to a small extent better – up to 3500 L, which is about 450 L more than the Nissan Townstar.
When it comes to payload, Peugeot Rifter evident takes the win – 814 kg compared to 641 kg. That’s a difference of about 173 kg.
The Peugeot Rifter is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Townstar is a pragmatic city companion that blends clever packaging with a calm, easygoing drive, making it ideal for urban errands and small-business hauls. It won't win any style contests, but its tidy interior, sensible features and no-nonsense character make it a genuinely useful buy for people who value practicality over pizzazz.
detailsThe Peugeot Rifter is a practical, family-friendly people carrier that makes everyday errands and weekend escapes feel effortless thanks to its airy cabin and clever, flexible interior. With chunky, purposeful styling and storage solutions everywhere, the Rifter manages to be both unashamedly useful and unexpectedly likeable.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25700 - 37700 £
|
Price
22900 - 36600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.3 - 20.7 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 - 19.1 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 281 km
|
Electric Range
328 - 339 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 157 g/km
|
co2
0 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1509 - 2041 kg
|
Curb weight
1498 - 1941 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
0 - 775 L
|
Trunk capacity
322 - 1050 L
|
|
Length
4488 - 4911 mm
|
Length
4405 - 4755 mm
|
|
Width
1859 - 1860 mm
|
Width
1848 mm
|
|
Height
1838 - 1869 mm
|
Height
1818 - 1837 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2800 - 3050 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3000 - 3500 L
|
|
Payload
506 - 641 kg
|
Payload
489 - 814 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 - 130 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 - 13.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.3 - 13.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
135 - 183 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 245 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
90 - 96 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1332 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E, F
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.