Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Nissan X-Trail vs Skoda Kamiq comparison
Compare performance (213 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 22,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan X-Trail or Skoda Kamiq?
Nissan X-Trail vs Skoda Kamiq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
X-Trail
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Kamiq is clearly cheaper – starting at 22,300 £ , while the Nissan X-Trail costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,889 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kamiq uses 5.3 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.
Kamiq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan X-Trail offers visibly more power – delivering 213 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 63 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan X-Trail is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Skoda Kamiq takes 8.1 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan X-Trail delivers substantially more torque with 525 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 275 Nm more.
X-Trail
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is noticeably lighter – 1,231 kg compared to 1,668 kg. The difference is around 437 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Nissan X-Trail offers noticeably more boot space – 585 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 185 L.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan X-Trail carries very slightly more – 574 kg compared to 539 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Nissan X-Trail is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £34,200
Nissan X-Trail
Nissan X-Trail
Skoda Kamiq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Nissan X-Trail
The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.
details
Skoda Kamiq
The Skoda Kamiq is a practical, well-built small crossover that mixes city-friendly manners with surprisingly versatile interior space and clever storage solutions. It offers a comfortable ride, user-friendly technology and solid value, making it a sensible choice for everyday driving.
details
Nissan X-Trail
Skoda Kamiq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 50,500 £
|
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
131 - 161 g/km
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,668 - 1,961 kg
|
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,840 mm
|
Width
1,793 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
432 - 574 kg
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.