VS

Omoda 5 vs XPeng G9 comparison

Compare performance (224 HP vs 575 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 51,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Omoda 5 or XPeng G9?

Omoda 5 vs XPeng G9: Key differences

Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • a bit more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

XPeng G9

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • noticeably more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

5

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Omoda 5 is substantially cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the XPeng G9 costs 51,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,314 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Omoda 5 is a bit more efficient: consuming 15.9 kWh/100km compared to 18.4 kWh/100km for the XPeng G9. That’s a difference of about 2.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the XPeng G9 offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 585 km, about 155 km more than the Omoda 5.

G9

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the XPeng G9 offers significantly more power – delivering 575 HP compared to 224 HP. That’s roughly 351 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng G9 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Omoda 5 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the XPeng G9 delivers substantially more torque with 695 Nm compared to 340 Nm. That’s about 355 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Omoda 5 is clearly lighter – 1,621 kg compared to 2,210 kg. The difference is around 589 kg.

Looking at boot space, the XPeng G9 offers substantially more boot space – 660 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 310 L.

When it comes to payload, the Omoda 5 carries marginally more – 536 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The XPeng G9 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £51,100
G9

XPeng G9

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 351 - 575 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.4 - 20.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 502 - 585 km
details

Frequently compared as well

XPeng G9
ZEEKR 7X
VS
The XPeng G9 and Zeekr 7X are two high-end electric SUVs from Chinese brands that compete on range, tech and comfort while aiming to deliver strong performance. This comparison focuses on real-world range, charging speed, driving dynamics, interior quality and ownership costs to help you decide …
Omoda 5
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Omoda 5 and BYD Atto 2 are eye-catching compact crossovers that compete on modern styling, tech-packed cabins and strong value for money. This quick comparison will show how they differ in space, equipment, driving character and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Omoda 5
XPeng G9

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a stylish compact crossover that catches the eye with a bold, contemporary look and a tech-forward cabin. It offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly spacious interior, making it a practical yet distinctive choice for buyers who want modern features and solid value.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pablo
8 May 2026, 07:59:00

Fantastic. It would be great to have a bit more battery capacity and a higher DC charging speed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

XPeng G9

The XPeng G9 is a spacious, tech-forward electric SUV that pairs a calm, refined ride with responsive performance and a high-quality, minimalist cabin. With strong emphasis on connectivity and advanced driving assistance, it’s a compelling choice if you want modern EV features and generous practicality without a legacy badge.

details
IMG_0235
IMG_0234
IMG_0233

Reviews XPeng G9

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
Walter
19 Jun 2026, 02:29:05

G9 Performance — currently the best electric car, with outstanding software and driving comfort. It stands up to any comparison with top models from Mercedes, BMW and Audi. Seven-year warranty and automatic updates.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Kiano Wotler
29 May 2026, 17:22:07

Very nice smooth riding car

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Oski
11 May 2026, 19:15:12

I drove the Mercedes EQS and the Xpeng G9 Performance. The Xpeng is an ultra-modern, voice-controlled car with excellent build quality, a superior sound system and air suspension. I now understand why VW invested €700 million to buy a 5% stake in Xpeng. VW cars in China now run on Xpeng technology.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rob
1 Jan 2026, 18:43:08

I've seen and driven both cars. The XPeng 9 makes more of an impression. The Zeekr 7x's interior color is limited to black — a real shame! For a nicer contrast you'll have to have it wrapped in a different color. But that's a matter of taste! Otherwise the cars are comparable, noting that the XPeng is a proper SUV while the Zeekr 7x is a crossover.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
XPeng G6
XPeng G9
VS
The XPeng G6 and XPeng G9 are two electric SUVs aimed at different buyers: the G6 is a compact, agile, tech-focused crossover, while the G9 is a larger, more premium flagship with greater range and comfort. This comparison highlights the key differences in size, range, performance, interior tech, …
XPeng G9
Omoda 9
VS
The XPeng G9 and Omoda 9 are two electric SUVs that square off on range, tech features and overall value—each targets buyers who want a spacious, high-tech mid‑size EV. This short comparison will focus on their driving feel, interior quality, charging performance and pricing to help you pick the …
Omoda 5
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Omoda 5 brings bold, modern styling and a tech-forward package, while the Toyota C‑HR emphasizes distinctive design, proven reliability and a refined hybrid powertrain. This comparison covers practicality, driving character, equipment and running costs to help you decide which compact crossover …
BMW iX3
XPeng G9
VS
The BMW iX3 and the XPeng G9 are both electric SUVs but take very different approaches: the iX3 delivers BMW’s familiar premium driving dynamics and conservative luxury, while the G9 emphasizes long range, aggressive value and advanced in‑car tech. If you prioritize traditional build quality and a …
Hyundai Tucson
Omoda 5
VS
The Hyundai Tucson and the Omoda 5 are two compact SUVs that appeal to buyers seeking practicality with distinct personalities — Tucson for proven dependability, Omoda 5 for sharp styling and tech-focused features. This comparison will pinpoint how they differ in space, equipment, driving feel and …
Omoda 5
Renault Symbioz
VS
This comparison pits the Omoda 5 against the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which car fits your needs. We'll cover design, practicality, driving experience, technology and running costs so you can tell whether the pragmatic, value-oriented Omoda 5 or the more futuristic Renault Symbioz aligns …
Tesla Model Y
XPeng G9
VS
Comparing the Tesla Model Y and the XPeng G9 pits Tesla’s efficient, minimalist electric SUV against XPeng’s upscale, tech‑rich rival. I’ll compare range, performance, interior comfort, tech features and ownership costs to help you pick the better match for your priorities.
Omoda 5
XPeng G9

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,800 - 31,600 £
Price
51,100 - 62,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.4 - 20.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
430 km
Electric Range
502 - 585 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 120 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,621 - 1,710 kg
Curb weight
2,210 - 2,395 kg
Trunk capacity
300 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
660 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,824 - 1,830 mm
Width
1,937 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
431 - 536 kg
Payload
515 - 520 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 224 HP
Power HP
351 - 575 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
295 - 340 Nm
Torque
465 - 695 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 - 165 kW
Power kW
258 - 423 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Omoda
Brand
XPeng
What drive types are available for the Omoda 5?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.