VS

Omoda 5 vs XPeng G9 comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 575 HP), boot space and price (31,600 £ vs 51,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Omoda 5 or XPeng G9?

Omoda 5 vs XPeng G9: Key differences

Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • a bit more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

XPeng G9

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • noticeably more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

5

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Omoda 5 is substantially cheaper – starting at 31,600 £ , while the XPeng G9 costs 51,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,457 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Omoda 5 is a bit more efficient: consuming 15.9 kWh/100km compared to 18.4 kWh/100km for the XPeng G9. That’s a difference of about 2.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the XPeng G9 offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 585 km, about 155 km more than the Omoda 5.

G9

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the XPeng G9 offers significantly more power – delivering 575 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 371 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng G9 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Omoda 5 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the XPeng G9 delivers substantially more torque with 695 Nm compared to 340 Nm. That’s about 355 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Omoda 5 is clearly lighter – 1,710 kg compared to 2,210 kg. The difference is around 500 kg.

Looking at boot space, the XPeng G9 offers substantially more boot space – 660 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 310 L.

When it comes to payload, the Omoda 5 carries marginally more – 536 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The XPeng G9 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £51,100
G9

XPeng G9

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 351 - 575 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.4 - 20.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 502 - 585 km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS plays the sensible family card with roomy practicality and a wallet-friendly price, while the Omoda 5 arrives like the showy new kid on the block, sporting sharper styling and richer tech. Pick the ZS for straightforward comfort and low running costs; choose the Omoda 5 if you want …
XPeng G9
ZEEKR 7X
VS
XPeng G9 arrives as a tech‑forward grand tourer — slick, serene and stuffed with autonomous driving toys and a luxurious, quietly sophisticated cabin; the ZEEKR 7X, by contrast, plays the sportier, more pragmatic card, delivering sharper handling, a brasher road presence and strong value for buyers …
Omoda 5
XPeng G9

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 arrives as a stylish, tech-forward compact crossover that punches above its class with bold design and a surprisingly premium cabin. It’s an attractive choice for buyers who want modern gadgets, confident road manners and value without the usual showroom drama.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pablo
8 May 2026, 07:59:00

Fantastic. It would be great to have a bit more battery capacity and a higher DC charging speed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

XPeng G9

The XPeng G9 feels like a confident leap into the electric SUV world, with sleek, purposeful styling and an interior that mixes modern tech with everyday comfort. On the road it’s calm and composed, serving up effortless pace and hushed refinement that turns long commutes into something you might actually enjoy — a strong pick for buyers who want electric convenience without compromise.

details
IMG_0235
IMG_0234
IMG_0233

Reviews XPeng G9

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
Oski
11 May 2026, 19:15:12

I drove the Mercedes EQS and the Xpeng G9 Performance. The Xpeng is an ultra-modern, voice-controlled car with excellent build quality, a superior sound system and air suspension. I now understand why VW invested €700 million to buy a 5% stake in Xpeng. VW cars in China now run on Xpeng technology.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rob
1 Jan 2026, 18:43:08

I've seen and driven both cars. The XPeng 9 makes more of an impression. The Zeekr 7x's interior color is limited to black — a real shame! For a nicer contrast you'll have to have it wrapped in a different color. But that's a matter of taste! Otherwise the cars are comparable, noting that the XPeng is a proper SUV while the Zeekr 7x is a crossover.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

XPeng G6
XPeng G9
VS
The XPeng G6 is the nimble, value-packed option — a compact EV that squeezes impressive range and smart tech into a friendly price, ideal for buyers who want clever daily driving without flagship sticker shock. The XPeng G9, by contrast, is the full-size flagship: more power, longer range and a …
Omoda 5
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The Omoda 5 and the MG 5 EV pit two different takes on compact family motoring against each other: the Omoda 5 delivers crossover styling, tech and a choice of powertrains, while the MG 5 EV is a practical, battery-electric estate focused on value and efficiency. If you favour bold design and a …
Omoda 5
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Omoda 5 and BYD Atto 2 are eye-catching compact crossovers that compete on modern styling, tech-packed cabins and strong value for money. This quick comparison will show how they differ in space, equipment, driving character and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
BYD Tang
XPeng G9
VS
BYD Tang and XPeng G9 are two compelling Chinese-built electric SUVs that target buyers looking for space and modern EV tech. The Tang leans toward practical value, strong charging and multi-powertrain options, while the XPeng G9 prioritizes premium refinement, advanced driver assistance and a …
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
Choosing between the Omoda 5 and the MG HS comes down to whether you want a compact crossover that prioritises bold styling and tech, or a more traditionally sized SUV that leans on space and refinement. Below is a clear, experience-based comparison to help match each model to your driving …
Kia Sportage
Omoda 5
VS
The Kia Sportage and the Omoda 5 go head-to-head in the compact SUV class, offering very different takes on style, technology and everyday practicality. This comparison will help you choose between the Sportage's proven comfort, refinement and broad dealer support and the Omoda 5's striking design, …
XPeng G9
Volvo EX60
VS
Comparing the XPeng G9 and the Volvo EX60 puts a tech-forward Chinese electric SUV up against a safety- and comfort-focused Swedish contender to help you see which approach suits your needs. I’ll outline the key differences in performance, range, charging, interior quality and ownership costs so …
Land Rover Range Rover
XPeng G9
VS
Comparing the Range Rover and the XPeng G9 puts classic British luxury and off-road capability against a cutting-edge electric SUV built around tech and efficiency. This brief comparison focuses on comfort, performance, technology and running costs to help you decide which suits your priorities.
Omoda 5
XPeng G9

Costs and Consumption
Price
31,600 £
Price
51,100 - 62,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.4 - 20.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
430 km
Electric Range
502 - 585 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,710 kg
Curb weight
2,210 - 2,395 kg
Trunk capacity
350 L
Trunk capacity
660 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,830 mm
Width
1,937 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
536 kg
Payload
515 - 520 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 HP
Power HP
351 - 575 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
340 Nm
Torque
465 - 695 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 kW
Power kW
258 - 423 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Omoda
Brand
XPeng
What drive types are available for the Omoda 5?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.