VS

Omoda 9 vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (537 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (45,300 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Omoda 9 or Skoda Kodiaq?

Omoda 9 vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

Omoda 9

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • somewhat more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • marginally more efficient
  • visibly lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

9

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Kodiaq is somewhat cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the Omoda 9 costs 45,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,465 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Omoda 9 with 1.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Omoda 9 offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 145 km, about 23 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 9 offers clearly more power – delivering 537 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 272 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 9 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.3 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Omoda 9 delivers markedly more torque with 650 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.

9

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is visibly lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 2,270 kg. The difference is around 586 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more boot space – 910 L compared to 471 L. That’s a difference of about 439 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries visibly more – 563 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 116 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Omoda 9 shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

£45,342
9

Omoda 9

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 537 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 145 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Lynk & Co 08
Omoda 9
VS
The Lynk & Co 08 and the Omoda 9 are two fresh contenders in the compact SUV segment, each promising standout styling, modern tech and family-friendly space. This quick comparison focuses on the real differences in driving feel, interior quality, fuel efficiency and value so you can decide which …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and VW Tayron are closely related midsize SUVs that focus on practicality and solid build quality, but they appeal to slightly different tastes and priorities. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the Kodiaq’s family-friendly versatility or the Tayron’s more …
Omoda 9
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Omoda 9

The Omoda 9 blends bold, contemporary styling with a surprisingly spacious and well-appointed interior that punches above its class. It offers a composed, comfortable ride and modern infotainment and safety features that make it a strong choice for buyers wanting a practical yet stylish family crossover.

details
IMG_3964
IMG_3965

Reviews Omoda 9

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Tommy
11 Jun 2026, 08:29:12

I recently bought the Omoda 9 — it's a premium car at the right price.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Geert
5 May 2026, 08:49:23

The Skoda Kodiac looks sleeker and is bigger. The Ford Explorer is a bit smaller and there was such a fuss made about it, but it’s disappointing in looks and even worse on the inside.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
MG MGS9
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and the MG MGS9 are both family-sized SUVs that prioritise space and practicality, but they offer contrasting strengths — the Kodiaq leans on refinement and proven engineering, while the MGS9 trades on value and a feature-rich kit. This comparison focuses on interior space, driving …
XPeng G9
Omoda 9
VS
The XPeng G9 and Omoda 9 are two electric SUVs that square off on range, tech features and overall value—each targets buyers who want a spacious, high-tech mid‑size EV. This short comparison will focus on their driving feel, interior quality, charging performance and pricing to help you pick the …
MG MGS9
Omoda 9
VS
The MG MGS9 and Omoda 9 are two bold, tech-focused SUVs from rising Chinese brands, both aimed at buyers who want roomy interiors, strong equipment levels and distinct styling without premium-brand prices. This comparison looks past the headlines to help you choose which one fits your …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Skoda Superb Combi
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Skoda Superb Combi is a roomy, practical estate that focuses on comfort and massive luggage space, while the Skoda Kodiaq is a taller, more versatile SUV that suits families needing optional seven-seat flexibility and a higher driving position. Choosing between them comes down to whether you …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Kodiaq target very different buyers: the Enyaq is an all-electric SUV focused on efficiency, modern tech and city-friendly driving, while the Kodiaq is a larger, traditional family SUV offering seven seats, greater towing and cargo capacity. This quick comparison highlights …
BYD Sealion 7
Omoda 9
VS
The BYD Sealion 7 and Omoda 9 are direct rivals in the modern, tech-forward family car space, each promising strong value, roomy cabins and a long feature list. This comparison will help you see how the Sealion 7’s approach to efficiency and refinement stacks up against the Omoda 9’s emphasis on …
Omoda 9
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
45,300 £
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
145 km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
38 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,270 kg
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity
471 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,920 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
447 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
537 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
650 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
395 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
Omoda
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the Omoda 9?

The Omoda 9 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.