VS

Vauxhall Combo Cargo vs Suzuki Swift comparison

Compare performance (136 HP vs 82 HP), boot space and price (27,100 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Vauxhall Combo Cargo or Suzuki Swift?

Vauxhall Combo Cargo vs Suzuki Swift: Key differences

Vauxhall Combo Cargo

  • visibly more power
details

Suzuki Swift

4.2 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • somewhat more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Combo Cargo

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Suzuki Swift is clearly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Vauxhall Combo Cargo costs 27,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,990 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Swift uses 4.4 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Vauxhall Combo Cargo with 5.2 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.

Swift

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Vauxhall Combo Cargo offers visibly more power – delivering 136 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Vauxhall Combo Cargo delivers considerably more torque with 300 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 188 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Suzuki Swift offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swift is clearly lighter – 1,069 kg compared to 1,371 kg. The difference is around 302 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Vauxhall Combo Cargo carries clearly more – 781 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 485 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Vauxhall Combo Cargo is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,100
Combo Cargo

Vauxhall Combo Cargo

  • Engine Type Diesel, Electric
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 102 - 136 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.2 - 5.4 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 354 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swift
Toyota Aygo
VS
If you want a pocket rocket that’s actually practical, the Suzuki Swift mixes sprightly handling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and sensible running costs — ideal for buyers who want fun without sacrificing everyday usability. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, is the cheeky city specialist: cheaper to buy, …
Suzuki Swift
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Choosing between the Suzuki Swift and the Suzuki Vitara comes down to whether you want a nimble city hatchback or a roomier compact SUV. The Swift excels with light steering, efficient running costs and easy parking, while the Vitara offers higher seating, more cargo space and light off-road …
Vauxhall Combo Cargo
Suzuki Swift

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Vauxhall Combo Cargo

The Opel Combo Cargo is a pragmatic workhorse that pairs sensible practicality with surprisingly car-like manners, making it a smart choice for small businesses and weekend DIYers. With clever storage, easy access and a calm cabin that keeps the focus on the job, it turns daily deliveries and errands into something almost enjoyable.

details
serpimg_I5WY7s

Reviews Vauxhall Combo Cargo

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Suzuki Swift

The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.

details
SUZUKI-519
SUZUKI SWIFT-678
SUZUKI SWIFT-954
SUZUKI-058
SUZUKI SWIFT-672
Swift_3

Reviews Suzuki Swift

4.2 (5 Reviews)
rate
eb
14 Jul 2026, 19:24:07

Pleasant car to drive, small engine but enough to overtake trucks and climb in the mountains at a decent pace, and to cruise at 130 on the motorway.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Kris
9 Apr 2026, 18:26:38

Superb quality, fun to drive, and every bit of well layed out kit you'll ever need.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Honda Jazz
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Honda Jazz and the Suzuki Swift comes down to whether you prioritise interior space and everyday practicality or a punchy, fun-to-drive hatchback with lower running costs. The Jazz is prized for its flexible cabin and comfortable urban manners, while the Swift offers sharper …
Dacia Sandero
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Dacia Sandero and Suzuki Swift are two sensible choices in the small-car segment that take different approaches: the Sandero emphasizes no‑frills value and space, while the Swift aims for sharper handling and a more polished feel. This comparison will focus on practicality, running costs, …
Fiat Panda
Suzuki Swift
VS
In the world of compact cars, the Fiat Panda and the Suzuki Swift both bring unique strengths to the table. The Fiat Panda excels with its practical and spacious interior, making it a champion of urban maneuverability and efficiency. On the other hand, the Suzuki Swift offers a peppier driving …
Hyundai i10
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Hyundai i10 is the sensible city slicker — compact, surprisingly roomy for its size, cheap to run and designed to make parking a confidence exercise rather than a stressful workout. The Suzuki Swift is the cheeky, slightly sportier option with sharper handling and bolder looks, so pick it if …
Suzuki Ignis
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Ignis and the Swift boils down to whether you want a feisty, high-riding city crossover with extra practicality or a more composed, sportier hatch with sharper handling. The Ignis stands out for its compact SUV character and clever packaging, while the Swift delivers a peppier …
Kia Picanto
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Kia Picanto and Suzuki Swift are two popular small hatchbacks that balance low running costs with practical, city-friendly dimensions. This comparison focuses on real-world usability, ownership costs and driving experience to help you pick the right one.
Ford Puma
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Ford Puma and Suzuki Swift compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Peugeot 208
Suzuki Swift
VS
In the battle of the compact hatchbacks, the Peugeot 208 offers a stylish design and a tech-forward interior, making it a popular choice for urban drivers. In contrast, the Suzuki Swift distinguishes itself with its punchy performance and exceptional fuel efficiency, appealing to those who value …
Vauxhall Combo Cargo
Suzuki Swift

Costs and Consumption
Price
27,100 - 34,800 £
Price
17,100 - 21,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 5.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
354 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 143 g/km
co2
98 - 110 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
2
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,371 - 1,674 kg
Curb weight
1,069 - 1,145 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,735 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
645 - 781 kg
Payload
282 - 296 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
Power HP
82 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 300 Nm
Torque
112 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
Power kW
61 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
1,197 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Vauxhall
Brand
Suzuki
What drivetrain options does the Vauxhall Combo Cargo have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.