Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Suzuki Swift – Which one offers the better deal?
Two cars, one duel: Ford Puma meets Suzuki Swift.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Suzuki Swift has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 17100 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 7629 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Suzuki Swift manages with 4.40 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.
Swift
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a significantly edge – offering 168 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 86 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs slightly better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Suzuki Swift tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls decisively stronger with 290 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 178 Nm difference.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Suzuki Swift is evident lighter – 1069 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 247 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers significantly more room – 523 L compared to 265 L. That’s a difference of about 258 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1283 L, which is about 303 L more than the Suzuki Swift.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma evident takes the win – 469 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 173 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Ford Puma shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £24,800
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Suzuki Swift
The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.
details
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Ford Puma
Suzuki Swift
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
17100 - 21200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
98 - 110 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
37 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1069 - 1145 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
265 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
3860 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1735 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1485 - 1510 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
980 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
282 - 296 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
82 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
112 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
61 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1197 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.