Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Vauxhall Grandland or Skoda Enyaq?
As the automotive industry increasingly pivots towards electrification, the competition in the SUV market intensifies, particularly in the crossover area. This article examines two notable contenders, the Opel Grandland and the Skoda Enyaq, delving into their technical aspects and innovations to help potential buyers make an informed decision.
The Opel Grandland impresses with its diverse engine lineup, offering petrol MHEV, plug-in hybrid, and electric options. It boasts power outputs ranging from 136 to 213 HP, with torque figures reaching up to 350 Nm. The Grandland's plug-in hybrid variant is particularly notable, combining efficiency with substantial electric range; its electric-only range peaks at an impressive 585 km.
On the other hand, the Skoda Enyaq prides itself on being fully electric. With power outputs between 210 and 340 HP, the Enyaq delivers strong performance, with rapid acceleration from 0-100 km/h in just 5.5 seconds for the most powerful variant. The Enyaq also offers a commendable electric range, up to 573 km, ensuring it can effortlessly handle long journeys without frequent recharging.
Both vehicles embody the modern SUV aesthetic, but they each have their unique flair. The Opel Grandland measures 4650 mm in length, 1934 mm in width, and stands 1665 mm tall. The design is characterized by a bold front grille and sharp, sophisticated lines that create a sporty profile.
The Skoda Enyaq, slightly shorter at 4649 mm, but with a wider stance at 1879 mm and a lower height of around 1620 mm provides an aerodynamic profile. Its clean design elements and the iconic Skoda grille give it a distinct appearance. When it comes to trunk capacity, the Enyaq edges ahead with 585 liters, compared to the Grandland's spacious 550 liters, making it a better choice for families or those needing extra storage.
Performance-wise, the Grandland accelerates from 0-100 km/h in a respectably quick 7.8 seconds for its plug-in hybrid variant, while the fully electric version manages the sprint in 9 seconds. The Grandland's maximum speed varies across the range, with some variants reaching up to an exhilarating 220 km/h, which is quite competitive for an SUV.
Conversely, the Skoda Enyaq, with its robust electric drivetrain, reaches a maximum speed of 180 km/h but compensates this with its impressive torque output, which can climb as high as 679 Nm. This immense torque guarantees swift and responsive acceleration, especially in urban environments.
In today's market, tech-savvy features play a pivotal role in consumer choices. The Opel Grandland incorporates a plethora of digital innovations, including advanced driver-assistance systems and an intuitive infotainment system. The touchscreen interface is user-friendly, ensuring seamless connectivity for drivers and passengers alike.
Skoda has not fallen behind in this area. The Enyaq is equipped with a state-of-the-art infotainment system, which includes a large central display and a digital cockpit to provide all the necessary information within the driver's reach. Furthermore, its range of driver-assistance features such as lane-keeping assistance and adaptive cruise control enhances the overall driving experience.
In summation, both the Opel Grandland and Skoda Enyaq present strong cases for anyone in the market for a new SUV, particularly in an increasingly eco-conscious world. The Grandland impresses with its versatile engine options and sporty performance, making it a compelling choice for those who value both efficiency and driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Enyaq's electric-only approach, generous range, and spacious interior make it ideal for tech-savvy, environmentally-minded consumers.
Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences regarding powertrains, interior space, and technological features. Given the increasing importance of sustainability, the fully electric Skoda Enyaq may have the edge for many buyers. Yet, for those who require versatility and a traditional combustion engine alongside electrified options, the Opel Grandland stands strong.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Vauxhall Grandland has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 32600 £, while the Skoda Enyaq costs 38100 £. That’s a price difference of around 5495 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s noticeable more efficient than the Vauxhall Grandland with 17.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3 kWh.
As for range, the Vauxhall Grandland performs somewhat better – achieving up to 694 km, about 107 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 340 HP compared to 325 HP. That’s roughly 15 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Vauxhall Grandland takes 6.10 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Vauxhall Grandland performs slightly better – reaching 220 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls distinct stronger with 679 Nm compared to 509 Nm. That’s about 170 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Vauxhall Grandland is somewhat lighter – 1675 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 327 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers barely noticeable more room – 585 L compared to 550 L. That’s a difference of about 35 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs minimal better – up to 1710 L, which is about 65 L more than the Vauxhall Grandland.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq barely noticeable takes the win – 509 kg compared to 495 kg. That’s a difference of about 14 kg.
The Skoda Enyaq proves to be has a very small edge and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Enyaq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
The Opel Grandland feels like a sensible, well-rounded SUV — neat styling, a spacious cabin and a composed ride that turns daily driving into a quietly pleasant experience. It’s a smart choice for buyers who want modern tech, good economy and a dash of German practicality without shouting for attention.
details
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
32600 - 51400 £
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 5.6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 18.6 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
82 - 694 km
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 126 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1675 - 2325 kg
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
485 - 550 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4650 mm
|
Length
4658 - 4660 mm
|
|
Width
1905 - 1934 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1665 mm
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1580 - 1645 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
|
Payload
425 - 495 kg
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 325 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.1 - 10.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 220 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 509 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
107 - 239 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Vauxhall
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España