Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Peugeot 2008 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (156 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (24500 £ vs 43300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 2008 or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
2008
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Peugeot 2008 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24500 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18823 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque manages with 3.70 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Peugeot 2008 with 4.90 L. The difference is about 1.20 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Peugeot 2008 performs significantly better – achieving up to 406 km, about 346 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a significantly edge – offering 269 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 113 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 7.20 s, while the Peugeot 2008 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque performs minimal better – reaching 213 km/h, while the Peugeot 2008 tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 7 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque pulls convincingly stronger with 540 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 270 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
2008
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Peugeot 2008 is convincingly lighter – 1263 kg compared to 1792 kg. The difference is around 529 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers barely noticeable more room – 472 L compared to 434 L. That’s a difference of about 38 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Peugeot 2008 performs distinct better – up to 1467 L, which is about 311 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque evident takes the win – 600 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 153 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Peugeot 2008 shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £24,500
Peugeot 2008
Peugeot 2008
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Peugeot 2008
5 (1 Reviews)
The Peugeot 2008 is a stylish, city-friendly crossover that packs big character into a compact package, turning mundane errands into a mildly entertaining drive. Its clever interior layout, polished looks and confident ride make it a smart choice for buyers who want practical daily sense with a touch of flair.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
1 (1 Reviews)
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Peugeot 2008
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24500 - 40300 £
|
Price
43300 - 64800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.50 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
406 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 67 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1263 - 1623 kg
|
Curb weight
1792 - 2157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
434 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
4304 mm
|
Length
4371 mm
|
|
Width
1770 mm
|
Width
1900 mm
|
|
Height
1523 mm
|
Height
1649 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1467 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1156 L
|
|
Payload
407 - 447 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
190 - 213 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Is the Peugeot 2008 offered with different drivetrains?
The Peugeot 2008 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.