VS

Peugeot 2008 vs MG Cyberster comparison

Compare performance (156 HP vs 510 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 55,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 2008 or MG Cyberster?

Peugeot 2008 vs MG Cyberster: Key differences

Peugeot 2008

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • barely more efficient
  • clearly lighter
  • substantially more trunk space
details

MG Cyberster

  • significantly more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

2008

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Peugeot 2008 is substantially cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the MG Cyberster costs 55,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 30,943 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Peugeot 2008 is barely more efficient: consuming 15.3 kWh/100km compared to 16.7 kWh/100km for the MG Cyberster. That’s a difference of about 1.4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the MG Cyberster offers clearly more range – reaching up to 507 km, about 102 km more than the Peugeot 2008.

Cyberster

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG Cyberster offers significantly more power – delivering 510 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 354 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG Cyberster is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.2 s, while the Peugeot 2008 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 5.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Cyberster delivers clearly more torque with 725 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 455 Nm more.

2008

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Peugeot 2008 offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 2008 is clearly lighter – 1,263 kg compared to 1,960 kg. The difference is around 697 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Peugeot 2008 offers substantially more boot space – 434 L compared to 200 L. That’s a difference of about 234 L.

When it comes to payload, the Peugeot 2008 carries clearly more – 447 kg compared to 150 kg. That’s a difference of about 297 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG Cyberster holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £55,700
Cyberster

MG Cyberster

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 340 - 510 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 443 - 507 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Opel Frontera
Peugeot 2008
VS
If you want unashamedly rugged, the Opel Frontera still wears its rough‑and‑ready off‑road badge with chunky looks and simple, go‑anywhere mechanics, whereas the Peugeot 2008 plays the smarter, city‑first crossover with sleek styling and the tech you actually use every day. Pick the Frontera for …
Peugeot 2008
Peugeot 3008
VS
Choosing between the Peugeot 2008 and the Peugeot 3008 boils down to whether you want a compact, city-friendly crossover or a more spacious, comfort-focused family SUV. The 2008 is nimbler and cheaper to run, while the 3008 delivers greater interior space, refinement and a broader range of stronger …
Peugeot 2008
MG Cyberster

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Peugeot 2008

The Peugeot 2008 is a compact crossover that blends sharp French styling with a practical, high-riding layout, giving it more presence and versatility than a typical small hatchback. Inside it offers a clever, user-friendly cabin with sensible storage and modern infotainment, while a composed ride and efficient powertrains make it well suited to both city errands and longer journeys.

details
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_021_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_026_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906PC_121_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_300_0

Reviews Peugeot 2008

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Prosper
26 Jun 2026, 17:36:12

This review applies to the GT version; cheap glossy plastics in the interior, lack of physical, dedicated climate/vent controls, narrow trunk width. On the plus side, excellent suspension that soaks up all the bumps, especially on gravel roads.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

MG Cyberster

The Cyberster is a striking new addition to the electric vehicle landscape, captivating enthusiasts with its sleek design and sporty silhouette. This all-electric convertible combines innovative technology with an exhilarating driving experience, making it a standout choice for those who crave adventure. With its commitment to sustainability and performance, the Cyberster is poised to redefine the way we think about modern roadsters.

details
serpimg_kJiKA7

Reviews MG Cyberster

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Peugeot 2008
Peugeot 308
VS
Deciding between the Peugeot 2008 and the Peugeot 308 comes down to lifestyle: the 2008 is a compact crossover that prioritises higher ride height, practicality and urban versatility, while the 308 is a sharper compact hatchback focused on driving dynamics and efficiency. If you need space, …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Peugeot 2008
VS
Putting the Alfa Romeo Junior against the Peugeot 2008 highlights a clash of eras: the Junior’s vintage Italian character and driver-focused feel versus the 2008’s modern, practical crossover sensibility. Choose the Junior when you want style, engagement and period charm; choose the 2008 for space, …
Jeep Avenger
Peugeot 2008
VS
Deciding between the Jeep Avenger and the Peugeot 2008 means choosing between two competent subcompact SUVs that balance city-friendly size with practical versatility. The Avenger leans into Jeep styling and a tougher image, especially with its electric option, while the 2008 emphasises refined …
Citroen C4
Peugeot 2008
VS
Comparing the Citroën C4 and the Peugeot 2008 helps you decide whether you prefer the C4’s comfort-focused hatchback character or the 2008’s taller, more practical crossover stance. I’ll highlight the key differences in space, ride, efficiency and features so you can pick the one that best matches …
Peugeot 2008
Skoda Epiq
VS
This short comparison pits the Peugeot 2008 against the Skoda Enyaq to help shoppers decide between a compact crossover and a larger electric SUV. I’ll run through how they stack up on space, practicality, driving experience and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily life.
Fiat 600
Peugeot 2008
VS
The Fiat 600 and the Peugeot 2008 take very different approaches to the small-car market: the 600 is a compact, city‑focused hatch while the 2008 is a taller, more versatile subcompact crossover. I’ll compare their space, driving feel, efficiency and running costs to help you decide which suits …
Peugeot 2008
Peugeot 408
VS
Choosing between the Peugeot 2008 and the Peugeot 408 means weighing a compact SUV’s higher ride height and urban versatility against a sleek, fastback-style family car that prioritises rear-seat space and highway composure. The 2008 suits buyers wanting agile city driving and practicality, while …
Peugeot 2008
VW Taigo
VS
The Peugeot 2008 and the VW Taigo are rival compact crossovers that blend city-friendly proportions with SUV styling. This comparison helps you decide whether you prefer the 2008’s bold design and character-filled interior or the Taigo’s more conventional styling, solid build and composed driving …
Peugeot 2008
MG Cyberster

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,800 - 40,400 £
Price
55,700 - 60,000 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
405 km
Electric Range
443 - 507 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 129 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Roadster
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,263 - 1,623 kg
Curb weight
1,960 - 2,060 kg
Trunk capacity
434 L
Trunk capacity
200 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,770 mm
Width
1,913 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
407 - 447 kg
Payload
150 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
Power HP
340 - 510 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.2 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
Torque
475 - 725 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Power kW
250 - 375 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Peugeot
Brand
MG
What drive types are available for the Peugeot 2008?

The Peugeot 2008 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.