Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Peugeot 2008 vs Volvo EC40 comparison
Compare performance (156 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 46,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 2008 or Volvo EC40?
Peugeot 2008 vs Volvo EC40: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
2008
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Peugeot 2008 is considerably cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,772 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Peugeot 2008 is only slightly more efficient: consuming 15.3 kWh/100km compared to 16.2 kWh/100km for the Volvo EC40. That’s a difference of about 0.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo EC40 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 585 km, about 180 km more than the Peugeot 2008.
EC40
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers clearly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 286 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Peugeot 2008 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 3.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EC40 delivers significantly more torque with 670 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 400 Nm more.
2008
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 2008 is substantially lighter – 1,263 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 802 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Peugeot 2008 offers very slightly more boot space – 434 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.
When it comes to payload, the Peugeot 2008 carries very slightly more – 447 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 12 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo EC40 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £46,500
Volvo EC40
Peugeot 2008
Volvo EC40
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Peugeot 2008
The Peugeot 2008 is a compact crossover that blends sharp French styling with a practical, high-riding layout, giving it more presence and versatility than a typical small hatchback. Inside it offers a clever, user-friendly cabin with sensible storage and modern infotainment, while a composed ride and efficient powertrains make it well suited to both city errands and longer journeys.
details
Volvo EC40
The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.
details
Peugeot 2008
Volvo EC40
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,800 - 40,400 £
|
Price
46,500 - 56,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
405 km
|
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,263 - 1,623 kg
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
434 L
|
Trunk capacity
404 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,770 mm
|
Width
1,873 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
407 - 447 kg
|
Payload
395 - 435 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.