VS

Peugeot 2008 vs Volvo ES90 comparison

Compare performance (156 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 69,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 2008 or Volvo ES90?

Peugeot 2008 vs Volvo ES90: Key differences

Peugeot 2008

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

Volvo ES90

3.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

2008

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Peugeot 2008 is clearly cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Volvo ES90 costs 69,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 45,172 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Peugeot 2008 is only slightly more efficient: consuming 15.3 kWh/100km compared to 16.6 kWh/100km for the Volvo ES90. That’s a difference of about 1.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo ES90 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 706 km, about 301 km more than the Peugeot 2008.

ES90

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo ES90 offers clearly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 524 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo ES90 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Peugeot 2008 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 4.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo ES90 delivers clearly more torque with 870 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 600 Nm more.

2008

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 2008 is considerably lighter – 1,263 kg compared to 2,610 kg. The difference is around 1,347 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo ES90 carries marginally more – 460 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 13 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo ES90 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £69,900
ES90

Volvo ES90

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 456 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 706 km
Peugeot 2008
Volvo ES90

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Peugeot 2008

The Peugeot 2008 is a stylish, city-friendly crossover that packs big character into a compact package, turning mundane errands into a mildly entertaining drive. Its clever interior layout, polished looks and confident ride make it a smart choice for buyers who want practical daily sense with a touch of flair.

details

Volvo ES90

The Volvo ES90 stands out as a luxury sedan, embodying Scandinavian elegance combined with innovative technology. Its sleek design is complemented by a plush interior that emphasizes comfort and safety, aligning with Volvo's renowned reputation. With advanced features and a focus on sustainability, the ES90 is a testament to the brand's commitment to responsible luxury.

details
Peugeot 2008
Volvo ES90

Costs and Consumption

Price
24,800 - 40,400 £
Price
69,900 - 74,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
405 km
Electric Range
706 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 129 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,263 - 1,623 kg
Curb weight
2,610 kg
Trunk capacity
434 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,770 mm
Width
1,942 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
407 - 447 kg
Payload
460 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
Power HP
456 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 5.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
Torque
670 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Power kW
335 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Peugeot
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.