Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Peugeot 2008 vs Volvo S60 comparison
Compare performance (156 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 42,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 2008 or Volvo S60?
Peugeot 2008 vs Volvo S60: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
2008
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Peugeot 2008 is clearly cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Volvo S60 costs 42,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,752 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo S60 uses 0.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Peugeot 2008 with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 4.2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Peugeot 2008 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 405 km, about 311 km more than the Volvo S60.
S60
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo S60 offers significantly more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 299 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo S60 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Peugeot 2008 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 3.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo S60 delivers considerably more torque with 709 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 439 Nm more.
2008
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 2008 is visibly lighter – 1,263 kg compared to 1,715 kg. The difference is around 452 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Peugeot 2008 offers marginally more boot space – 434 L compared to 427 L. That’s a difference of about 7 L.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo S60 carries very slightly more – 475 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 28 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo S60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £42,500
Volvo S60
Peugeot 2008
Volvo S60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Peugeot 2008
The Peugeot 2008 is a compact crossover that blends sharp French styling with a practical, high-riding layout, giving it more presence and versatility than a typical small hatchback. Inside it offers a clever, user-friendly cabin with sensible storage and modern infotainment, while a composed ride and efficient powertrains make it well suited to both city errands and longer journeys.
details
Volvo S60
The Volvo S60 wears Scandinavian understatement like a tailored suit, pairing a serene cabin with composed handling that makes the daily commute feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers after executive looks, rock‑solid safety and practical versatility — with a dash of discreet luxury — it's a persuasive pick that doesn't need to shout for attention.
details
Peugeot 2008
Volvo S60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,800 - 40,400 £
|
Price
42,500 - 65,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.7 - 7.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
405 km
|
Electric Range
94 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
co2
16 - 161 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,263 - 1,623 kg
|
Curb weight
1,715 - 2,039 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
434 L
|
Trunk capacity
390 - 427 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,778 mm
|
|
Width
1,770 mm
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,431 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
407 - 447 kg
|
Payload
461 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
|
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.