VS

Peugeot 2008 vs Volvo V60 comparison

Compare performance (156 HP vs 350 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 51,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 2008 or Volvo V60?

Peugeot 2008 vs Volvo V60: Key differences

Peugeot 2008

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
  • clearly lighter
details

Volvo V60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

2008

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Peugeot 2008 is considerably cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Volvo V60 costs 51,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,658 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo V60 uses 2 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Peugeot 2008 with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 2.9 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Peugeot 2008 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 405 km, about 306 km more than the Volvo V60.

V60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V60 offers significantly more power – delivering 350 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 194 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo V60 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Peugeot 2008 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo V60 delivers significantly more torque with 589 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 319 Nm more.

2008

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 2008 is clearly lighter – 1,263 kg compared to 1,734 kg. The difference is around 471 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo V60 offers moderately more boot space – 519 L compared to 434 L. That’s a difference of about 85 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo V60 carries moderately more – 506 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 59 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo V60 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £51,400
V60

Volvo V60

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 197 - 350 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2 - 6.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 99 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Opel Frontera
Peugeot 2008
VS
If you want unashamedly rugged, the Opel Frontera still wears its rough‑and‑ready off‑road badge with chunky looks and simple, go‑anywhere mechanics, whereas the Peugeot 2008 plays the smarter, city‑first crossover with sleek styling and the tech you actually use every day. Pick the Frontera for …
Peugeot 2008
Peugeot 3008
VS
Choosing between the Peugeot 2008 and the Peugeot 3008 boils down to whether you want a compact, city-friendly crossover or a more spacious, comfort-focused family SUV. The 2008 is nimbler and cheaper to run, while the 3008 delivers greater interior space, refinement and a broader range of stronger …
Peugeot 2008
Volvo V60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Peugeot 2008

The Peugeot 2008 is a compact crossover that blends sharp French styling with a practical, high-riding layout, giving it more presence and versatility than a typical small hatchback. Inside it offers a clever, user-friendly cabin with sensible storage and modern infotainment, while a composed ride and efficient powertrains make it well suited to both city errands and longer journeys.

details
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_021_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_026_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906PC_121_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_300_0

Reviews Peugeot 2008

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Prosper
26 Jun 2026, 17:36:12

This review applies to the GT version; cheap glossy plastics in the interior, lack of physical, dedicated climate/vent controls, narrow trunk width. On the plus side, excellent suspension that soaks up all the bumps, especially on gravel roads.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo V60

The Volvo V60 blends elegant Scandinavian design with a practical estate layout, making it a composed and sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. Inside, a serene cabin, clever safety features and a supple ride turn daily commutes and weekend getaways into effortless, grown-up motoring.

details
228902_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue
228900_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue
228898_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue
247770_Volvo_V60_T8_Test_Drive_in_Lule_Sweden
223558_New_Volvo_V60_exterior

Reviews Volvo V60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Michael Hauser
2 Oct 2025, 08:00:10

I drive a V60 T6 TE e‑AWD Inscription MY 2022

Overall I'm very satisfied with it.

Positives +
+ Safety
+ Performance
+ Fuel consumption
+ Service and running costs
+ Driving feel (still has a bit of the Swedish tank about it)
+ Average consumption 5.2 l/100 km

Negatives -
- 180 km/h limiter, supposedly due to excessive centrifugal forces on the electric motor
- Thinner side windows than the predecessor
- Still very firm suspension
- 8‑speed automatic (feels like the car is always shifting)
- Volvo's own customer service has massively deteriorated in recent years (their new motto seems to be "take it or leave it")

As a long‑time Volvo customer, this will be my last Volvo — I'm not willing to go along with the (now purely electric and largely China‑produced) madness.

Frequently compared as well

Peugeot 2008
Peugeot 308
VS
Deciding between the Peugeot 2008 and the Peugeot 308 comes down to lifestyle: the 2008 is a compact crossover that prioritises higher ride height, practicality and urban versatility, while the 308 is a sharper compact hatchback focused on driving dynamics and efficiency. If you need space, …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo V60 is a sleek, premium estate built for refined cruising and carrying larger loads, while the Volvo XC40 is a compact SUV focused on city agility, practicality and a taller driving position. Choosing between them comes down to whether you want wagon-style space and long-distance comfort …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Peugeot 2008
VS
Putting the Alfa Romeo Junior against the Peugeot 2008 highlights a clash of eras: the Junior’s vintage Italian character and driver-focused feel versus the 2008’s modern, practical crossover sensibility. Choose the Junior when you want style, engagement and period charm; choose the 2008 for space, …
Jeep Avenger
Peugeot 2008
VS
Deciding between the Jeep Avenger and the Peugeot 2008 means choosing between two competent subcompact SUVs that balance city-friendly size with practical versatility. The Avenger leans into Jeep styling and a tougher image, especially with its electric option, while the 2008 emphasises refined …
Citroen C4
Peugeot 2008
VS
Comparing the Citroën C4 and the Peugeot 2008 helps you decide whether you prefer the C4’s comfort-focused hatchback character or the 2008’s taller, more practical crossover stance. I’ll highlight the key differences in space, ride, efficiency and features so you can pick the one that best matches …
Fiat 600
Peugeot 2008
VS
The Fiat 600 and the Peugeot 2008 take very different approaches to the small-car market: the 600 is a compact, city‑focused hatch while the 2008 is a taller, more versatile subcompact crossover. I’ll compare their space, driving feel, efficiency and running costs to help you decide which suits …
Peugeot 2008
Peugeot 408
VS
Choosing between the Peugeot 2008 and the Peugeot 408 means weighing a compact SUV’s higher ride height and urban versatility against a sleek, fastback-style family car that prioritises rear-seat space and highway composure. The 2008 suits buyers wanting agile city driving and practicality, while …
Peugeot 2008
Skoda Epiq
VS
This short comparison pits the Peugeot 2008 against the Skoda Enyaq to help shoppers decide between a compact crossover and a larger electric SUV. I’ll run through how they stack up on space, practicality, driving experience and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily life.
Peugeot 2008
Volvo V60

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,800 - 40,400 £
Price
51,400 - 62,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2 - 6.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
405 km
Electric Range
99 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 129 g/km
co2
45 - 141 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,263 - 1,623 kg
Curb weight
1,734 - 2,070 kg
Trunk capacity
434 L
Trunk capacity
519 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,770 mm
Width
1,850 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
407 - 447 kg
Payload
460 - 506 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
Power HP
197 - 350 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
Torque
300 - 589 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Power kW
145 - 247 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
Brand
Peugeot
Brand
Volvo
What drive types are available for the Peugeot 2008?

The Peugeot 2008 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.