Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Peugeot 3008 vs Skoda Superb Combi - Differences and prices compared
3008
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Peugeot 3008 has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 35100 £, while the Skoda Superb Combi costs 35200 £. That’s a price difference of around 86 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Superb Combi manages with 0.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Peugeot 3008 with 2.40 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Peugeot 3008 performs decisively better – achieving up to 698 km, about 564 km more than the Skoda Superb Combi.
Superb Combi
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 3008 has a to a small extent edge – offering 325 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 60 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Superb Combi is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 5.70 s, while the Peugeot 3008 takes 6 s. That’s about 0.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Superb Combi performs somewhat better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Peugeot 3008 tops out at 220 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Peugeot 3008 pulls distinct stronger with 511 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 111 Nm difference.
3008
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .
In curb weight, Skoda Superb Combi is hardly perceptible lighter – 1575 kg compared to 1648 kg. The difference is around 73 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Superb Combi offers distinct more room – 690 L compared to 520 L. That’s a difference of about 170 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Superb Combi performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1920 L, which is about 440 L more than the Peugeot 3008.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Superb Combi noticeable takes the win – 584 kg compared to 467 kg. That’s a difference of about 117 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Skoda Superb Combi proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Superb Combi is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £35,200
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Superb Combi
Peugeot 3008
Skoda Superb Combi
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Peugeot 3008
3.6 (2 Reviews)
The Peugeot 3008 blends bold French styling with a surprisingly grown-up interior that makes even dull commutes feel a little bit special. Practical enough for family life yet lively to drive, it’s a clever all‑rounder that stands out from the crossover crowd without shouting for attention.
details
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
Skoda Superb Combi
The Skoda Superb Combi is the practical hero of the estate world, offering cavernous space and a calm, refined ride that makes family life feel effortless. Its clever features, understated design and no-nonsense value make it a smart pick for buyers who want Germanic engineering without the badge premium — and it even manages to stay surprisingly stylish while doing all the heavy lifting.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Peugeot 3008
Skoda Superb Combi
|
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
35100 - 52000 £
|
Price
35200 - 51000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 7.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 - 17.6 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
81 - 698 km
|
Electric Range
124 - 134 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 96.9 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 121 g/km
|
co2
8 - 178 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 66 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1648 - 2266 kg
|
Curb weight
1575 - 1853 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
470 - 520 L
|
Trunk capacity
510 - 690 L
|
|
Length
4542 mm
|
Length
4902 mm
|
|
Width
1895 mm
|
Width
1849 mm
|
|
Height
1641 mm
|
Height
1482 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1430 - 1480 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1770 - 1920 L
|
|
Payload
432 - 467 kg
|
Payload
497 - 584 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 325 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 10.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 220 km/h
|
Max Speed
220 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 511 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 239 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F, D, G
|
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drive types are available for the Peugeot 3008?
The Peugeot 3008 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.