Compare performance (325 HP vs 320 HP), boot space and price (36,500 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 3008 or VW Arteon?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to finding a vehicle that perfectly balances innovation, comfort, and efficiency, the Peugeot 3008 and VW Arteon both make compelling cases. These two models, each from prominent European manufacturers, cater to different segments but share a commitment to quality and performance. Let's dive into how these cars stack up against each other in key areas.
The Peugeot 3008 embodies the essence of a modern SUV, offering a robust stance and the practicality of an SUV's higher driving position. With dimensions of 4542 mm in length, 1895 mm in width, and 1641 mm in height, the 3008 ensures both maneuverability and ample cabin space. In contrast, the VW Arteon presents itself as a stylish wagon, with streamlined aesthetics extending to a sizable length of 4866 mm, width of 1871 mm, and a significantly lower height of around 1451 mm. The Arteon's design speaks to those who prioritize sleek, car-like performance with the added utility of a wagon.
Powering the Peugeot 3008 is a range of engine options including petrol mild hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and electric variants. These power units produce outputs ranging from 136 to 231 HP and offer torque between 230 and 345 Nm. The 3008 boasts an acceleration from 0-100 km/h in as quick as 8.4 seconds, cementing its credentials as a spirited urban racer.
The VW Arteon, however, showcases its prowess with even more powerful offerings. With engine choices reaching up to 320 HP and torque of 420 Nm, it sprints from 0-100 km/h in a swift 4.9 seconds. The Arteon's drive options, both front-wheel and all-wheel, promise enhanced performance and stability across varying conditions.
Pushing the envelope in fuel efficiency, the Peugeot 3008 showcases a remarkable variance in consumption, especially with its plug-in hybrid and electric versions achieving up to 0.9 L/100km and a full electric range of up to 698 km. Its CO2 emissions are low, at 0 g/km for its electric variant, making it an eco-conscious choice.
The VW Arteon, while focusing more on performance, displays a competent efficiency with its diesel and petrol engines, achieving a consumption rate as low as 5.1 L/100km. However, its least efficient variants emit up to 195 g/km, displaying a broader spectrum in environmental impact based on engine choice.
Both vehicles are fitted with automatic transmission systems; the 3008 features Dual-Clutch or Reduction Gearbox, whereas the Arteon comes standard with a Dual-Clutch Automatic system. These advanced transmission options enhance driving dynamics and shift smoothness.
Interior-wise, the 3008 offers a trunk capacity of 520 liters, accommodating typical family luggage requirements with ease. However, the Arteon surpasses this with a larger trunk capacity of 590 liters, catering more to long-haul travelers or those needing extra cargo space.
Ultimately, choosing between the Peugeot 3008 and the VW Arteon depends on the buyer's priorities. The 3008 presents itself as the groundbreaking choice for tech enthusiasts and environmentally conscious drivers, while the Arteon captivates with its power-centric performance and elegant design. Both vehicles demonstrate that modern engineering can uniquely cater to distinct lifestyles, making them both worthy of consideration for any discerning car buyer.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Peugeot 3008 is a bit cheaper – starting at 36,500 £ , while the VW Arteon costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,767 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Peugeot 3008 uses 2.4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the VW Arteon with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 2.7 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 3008 offers only slightly more power – delivering 325 HP compared to 320 HP. That’s roughly 5 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Arteon is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Peugeot 3008 takes 6 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 3008 delivers somewhat more torque with 511 Nm compared to 420 Nm. That’s about 91 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, VW Arteon is only slightly lighter – 1,607 kg compared to 1,648 kg. The difference is around 41 kg.
Looking at boot space, the VW Arteon offers somewhat more boot space – 590 L compared to 520 L. That’s a difference of about 70 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW Arteon carries somewhat more – 569 kg compared to 467 kg. That’s a difference of about 102 kg.
The Peugeot 3008 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Peugeot 3008 blends striking, modern styling with a comfortable, well-appointed interior that feels more premium than its class. It's practical and composed on the road, with clever storage and driver-focused tech that make it an easy choice for everyday family life or longer, relaxed drives.
details
The VW Arteon cuts a fastback silhouette that manages to look more expensive than it is, with a cabin that feels calm, roomy and smartly finished. It blends relaxed long distance comfort with a touch of sporting poise, making it a clever choice for buyers who want grand touring polish without shouting for attention.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,500 - 52,200 £
|
Price
43,300 - 60,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 5.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 8.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 - 17.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
81 - 698 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 121 g/km
|
co2
133 - 195 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
66 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,648 - 2,266 kg
|
Curb weight
1,607 - 1,773 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
470 - 520 L
|
Trunk capacity
590 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,866 mm
|
|
Width
1,895 mm
|
Width
1,871 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,434 - 1,451 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,632 L
|
|
Payload
432 - 467 kg
|
Payload
467 - 569 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 325 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 320 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 10.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 9.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
216 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 511 Nm
|
Torque
320 - 420 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 239 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 235 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,968 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G
|
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España