VS

Peugeot 408 vs Mazda CX-6e comparison

Compare performance (240 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (35,100 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 408 or Mazda CX-6e?

Peugeot 408 vs Mazda CX-6e: Key differences

Peugeot 408

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • visibly more efficient
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially lighter
details

Mazda CX-6e

  • only slightly more power
  • marginally more electric range
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

408

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Peugeot 408 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 35,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-6e costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,731 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Peugeot 408 is visibly more efficient: consuming 14.7 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 4.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mazda CX-6e offers marginally more range – reaching up to 484 km, about 28 km more than the Peugeot 408.

CX-6e

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-6e offers only slightly more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 240 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot 408 is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.2 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 408 delivers a bit more torque with 360 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.

408

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 408 is substantially lighter – 1,544 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 661 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Peugeot 408 carries a bit more – 456 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 71 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Peugeot 408 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £35,100
408

Peugeot 408

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 145 - 240 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.6 - 5 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 79 - 456 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Sealion 7
Mazda CX-6e
VS
In one corner is the tech‑packed BYD Sealion 7, a gadget-rich challenger promising range and features for the money; in the other is the Mazda CX‑6e, Mazda’s sleeker, driver-focused answer with a more premium feel. We’ll pit them on comfort, performance, tech and running costs so you know which one …
ZEEKR 7X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Today we line up the ZEEKR 7X against the Mazda CX-6e — a clash of tech-forward electric ambition and Mazda’s quietly polished refinement. Expect roomy practicality, electric punch and a few surprising details that could decide which one earns a spot in your garage.
Peugeot 408
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Peugeot 408

The Peugeot 408 blends a coupe-like roofline with practical sensibility, delivering striking looks and a surprisingly airy, premium-feeling cabin. On the road it prefers comfort and poise over manic thrills, making it a smart, stylish choice for buyers who want something a bit different from the usual family hatchback.

details
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC523
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC516
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC519
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC522
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC032

Reviews Peugeot 408

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
Klaudia
15 Jan 2026, 19:46:29

This is one of the most beautiful cars of our time, in an era when every brand churns out cookie‑cutter models — as long as they look like an SUV. It's comfortable, incredibly spacious, picks up nicely on the road and always makes a great impression everywhere ;)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
serpimg_tXFAQx

Reviews Mazda CX-6e

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Peugeot 3008
Peugeot 408
VS
The Peugeot 3008 and Peugeot 408 are closely related models aimed at different priorities: the 3008 is a traditional compact SUV that emphasizes practicality and an elevated driving position, while the 408 blends coupe-like lines with hatchback practicality for a sleeker, more road-focused …
Tesla Model Y
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Mazda CX-6e represent two distinct takes on the modern electric SUV: Tesla focuses on range, software and charging convenience, while Mazda emphasizes refinement, build quality and a more traditional driving feel. This comparison will help you weigh the Model Y’s performance …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
VW ID.4
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The VW ID.4 and the Mazda CX-6e represent two different takes on the modern electric crossover: the ID.4 leans on roomy practicality and straightforward tech, while the CX-6e brings Mazda’s styling and driving feel to an electrified package. This comparison will cover range and charging, driving …
Kia EV5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Kia EV5 and Mazda CX-6e pits two fresh electric crossovers from established brands against each other, each promising a mix of range, tech and everyday practicality. This quick head-to-head will help you see which suits your driving needs and lifestyle better.
Peugeot 308
Peugeot 408
VS
Choosing between the 308 and the 408 comes down to whether you want a compact, agile hatchback for city life or a sleeker fastback-style sedan with more cabin and boot space. This comparison focuses on styling, practicality, driving feel and running costs to help you decide which best fits your …
Toyota bZ4X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Toyota bZ4X and Mazda CX-6e highlights two different takes on the electric crossover: Toyota’s practical, reliability-focused approach versus Mazda’s more premium, driver-oriented take. I’ll run through range and charging, interior and tech, driving dynamics, and running costs so you …
Peugeot 408
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption
Price
35,100 - 48,000 £
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
79 - 456 km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 114 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,544 - 1,879 kg
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
468 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,935 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
371 - 456 kg
Payload
385 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
145 - 240 HP
Power HP
258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 9.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
107 - 176 kW
Power kW
190 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Peugeot
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Peugeot 408 have?

The Peugeot 408 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.