Compare performance (325 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (39,300 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 5008 or Skoda Enyaq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The automotive landscape continues to evolve with the emergence of electric and hybrid vehicles, and two prominent players in this segment are the Peugeot 5008 and the Skoda Enyaq. Both vehicles embody different approaches to family transport, combining innovative technology and spacious interiors. This article provides a comprehensive comparison between the two, looking at their technical specifications, innovations, and overall appeal.
At first glance, the Peugeot 5008 is a sleek SUV measuring 4791 mm in length, 1895 mm in width, and 1694 mm in height. It boasts a robust stance and offers the versatility of a 7-seat arrangement, making it suitable for larger families or those needing extra passenger capacity. In contrast, the Skoda Enyaq is slightly smaller at its maximum length of 4658 mm (with some variations up to 4658 mm) and has a width of 1879 mm and a height ranging from 1620 mm to 1623 mm. The Enyaq, designed as a 5-seater, emphasizes a more compact body while still offering ample space for occupants and cargo.
The Peugeot 5008 offers a variety of powertrains including petrol MHEV, plug-in hybrid, and full electric options, with power outputs ranging from 136 to a robust 231 HP. This model embraces advanced technologies designed for efficient performance, with a consumption rating between 1 L (for hybrid variants) and 5.8 L/100 km (for petrol engines). The vehicle accelerates from 0-100 km/h in as quick as 8.8 seconds, showcasing its performance capabilities.
On the other hand, the Skoda Enyaq is exclusively electric, providing outputs of 204, 286, and even 340 HP, with torque figures as high as 679 Nm. This impressive torque delivery translates to exhilarating acceleration, with times as low as 5.5 seconds from 0-100 km/h. The Enyaq’s efficiency is notable, displaying energy consumption rates between 14.6 and 16.4 kWh/100 km, which contributes to a competitive electric range of up to 587 km, depending on the battery choice.
The Peugeot 5008 offers multiple battery options, with capacities ranging from 17.8 kWh to 96.9 kWh, particularly advantageous for hybrid or electric variants. Its electric range reaches up to 664 km, providing great flexibility in usage. For longer journeys, the dual-clutch automatic and reduction gearbox ensure smooth transitions between driving modes.
Conversely, the Skoda Enyaq features battery capacities of 59 kWh and 77 kWh, streamlining the charging process. The Enyaq supports fast charging capabilities, ensuring that it can replenish its battery quickly during road trips, enhancing its usability for daily commutes or longer travels.
The interior of the Peugeot 5008 is crafted for comfort and practicality, with a trunk capacity of 748 liters, making it one of the spacious options in the SUV segment. Its 7-seater configuration includes modern technology elements such as a digital cockpit and advanced infotainment systems, enhancing connectivity and user experience.
In contrast, the Skoda Enyaq prioritizes a sleek modern design coupled with sustainability. The Enyaq’s trunk also offers a competitive capacity of 585 liters. The vehicle comes equipped with the latest digital displays and smart connectivity features, creating an intuitive driving environment for tech-savvy families.
As emissions regulations become stricter, the Skoda Enyaq stands out with its 0 g/km CO2 efficiency, positioning it as a leader in eco-friendliness. The Peugeot 5008 offers varying CO2 emissions, ranging from 23 g/km for its hybrid variants to higher figures for traditional petrol models, falling under multiple efficiency classes.
When choosing between the Peugeot 5008 and the Skoda Enyaq, potential buyers must evaluate their priorities. The Peugeot 5008 excels in flexibility with its 7-seat capacity and multiple powertrains, catering to families requiring more space and versatility. Meanwhile, the Skoda Enyaq offers an efficient electric driving experience with cutting-edge technology, making it an excellent choice for environmentally conscious consumers.
Ultimately, the right choice will depend on individual needs, lifestyles, and preferences. Both vehicles represent significant strides in automotive technology, blending innovation with practicality in today’s dynamic market.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Enyaq is barely cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Peugeot 5008 costs 39,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,460 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is slightly more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 17.8 kWh/100km for the Peugeot 5008. That’s a difference of about 2.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Peugeot 5008 offers moderately more range – reaching up to 669 km, about 80 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers only slightly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 325 HP. That’s roughly 15 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Peugeot 5008 takes 6.5 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers clearly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 511 Nm. That’s about 168 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Peugeot 5008 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 5008 is markedly lighter – 1,700 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 374 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers significantly more boot space – 585 L compared to 348 L. That’s a difference of about 237 L.
When it comes to payload, the Peugeot 5008 carries somewhat more – 640 kg compared to 526 kg. That’s a difference of about 114 kg.
The Skoda Enyaq holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Peugeot 5008 blends Peugeot's sharp design with the space and versatility families actually need, wrapping clever packaging and a premium-feeling cabin in a crisp, SUV-like silhouette. It drives with more poise than you'd expect from a people carrier, serves up practical touches and flexible seating for everyday chaos, and still looks good when parked outside the school gates.
details
The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
39,300 - 54,300 £
|
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 18.1 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
78 - 669 km
|
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 127 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,700 - 2,344 kg
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
294 - 348 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,895 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
596 - 640 kg
|
Payload
449 - 526 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 325 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 10.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 511 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
107 - 239 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España