Is the Peugeot Partner offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Peugeot Partner deliver on the road?

Up to 136 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Peugeot Partner use?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5.20 L.

What is the Peugeot Partner’s energy consumption?

According to the manufacturer, the Peugeot Partner requires 17.40 kWh.

What is the Peugeot Partner’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 354 km.

What are the dimensions of the Peugeot Partner?

Length 4753 mm, width 1848 mm, height 1812 mm – those are the dimensions of the Peugeot Partner.

What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-6e have?

The Mazda CX-6e is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda CX-6e?

Up to 258 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much electricity does the Mazda CX-6e use per 100 km?

In the WLTP cycle, the Mazda CX-6e consumes around 18.90 kWh.

What is the Mazda CX-6e’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 484 km.

Peugeot Partner vs Mazda CX-6e - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Partner

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Peugeot Partner has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 22400 £ , while the Mazda CX-6e costs 42800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20459 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Peugeot Partner: with 17.40 kWh per 100 km, it’s slight more efficient than the Mazda CX-6e with 18.90 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.50 kWh.

As for electric range, the Mazda CX-6e performs noticeable better – achieving up to 484 km, about 130 km more than the Peugeot Partner.

Partner

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-6e has a significantly edge – offering 258 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-6e is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 7.90 s, while the Peugeot Partner takes 11.20 s. That’s about 3.30 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Peugeot Partner pulls slight stronger with 300 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm difference.

Partner

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Peugeot Partner is significantly lighter – 1329 kg compared to 2205 kg. The difference is around 876 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Peugeot Partner offers clearly more room – 1800 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 1332 L.

When it comes to payload, Peugeot Partner convincingly takes the win – 991 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 606 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Peugeot Partner holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Reviews Peugeot Partner

Reviews Mazda CX-6e

Top Car Comparisons

Peugeot Partner

Peugeot Rifter

VS

In the battle of practicality and versatility, the Peugeot Socio stands out with its contemporary design and efficient use of space, making it an ideal choice for urban dwellers. In contrast, the Peugeot Rifter impresses with its robust exterior and family-friendly features, offering ample cargo …

Peugeot Partner

Toyota Proace City

VS

Peugeot Partner and Toyota Proace City go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.

Costs and Consumption
Price 22400 - 33800 £	Price 42800 £
Consumption L/100km 5.2 - 6.3 L	Consumption L/100km -
Consumption kWh/100km 17.40 kWh	Consumption kWh/100km 18.90 kWh
Electric Range 354 km	Electric Range 484 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 0 - 143 g/km	co2 0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 53 - 61 L	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type Cargo Van	Body Type SUV
Seats 2 - 5	Seats 5
Doors 4 - 5	Doors -
Curb weight 1329 - 1813 kg	Curb weight 2205 kg
Trunk capacity 1800 L	Trunk capacity 468 L
Length 4403 - 4753 mm	Length -
Width 1848 mm	Width 1935 mm
Height 1796 - 1812 mm	Height -
Max trunk capacity 3300 - 4000 L	Max trunk capacity -
Payload 611 - 991 kg	Payload 385 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Electric, Diesel, Petrol	Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic, Manuel	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP 102 - 136 HP	Power HP 258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 11.20 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.90 s
Max Speed 135 - 183 km/h	Max Speed -
Torque 205 - 300 Nm	Torque 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders -
Power kW 75 - 100 kW	Power kW 190 kW
Engine capacity 1199 - 1499 cm3	Engine capacity -