VS

Renault Arkana vs Ferrari 296 Coupe comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 880 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 348,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Ferrari 296 Coupe?

Renault Arkana vs Ferrari 296 Coupe: Key differences

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • slightly lighter
details

Ferrari 296 Coupe

  • significantly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Arkana

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Arkana is substantially cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Ferrari 296 Coupe costs 348,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 320,400 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Ferrari 296 Coupe with 8.9 L/100km. The difference is about 4.2 L/100km.

296 Coupe

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ferrari 296 Coupe offers significantly more power – delivering 880 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 737 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ferrari 296 Coupe is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 2.8 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ferrari 296 Coupe delivers considerably more torque with 755 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 550 Nm more.

Arkana

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Renault Arkana offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is slightly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,670 kg. The difference is around 160 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries considerably more – 451 kg compared to 225 kg. That’s a difference of about 226 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Arkana holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £28,500
Arkana

Renault Arkana

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.7 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
Choosing between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Austral comes down to whether you want a coupe‑styled compact SUV that prioritises flair and efficiency (Arkana) or a more conventional family SUV that emphasises space and refinement (Austral). This comparison will cut through the marketing to …
Renault Arkana
Ferrari 296 Coupe

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Ferrari 296 Coupe

Slip behind the wheel of the Ferrari 296 GTB and you get a compact supercar that turns everyday roads into a racetrack with intoxicating urgency and razor-sharp poise. It's the perfect choice for drivers who want headline-grabbing performance and Ferrari drama without the showroom theatrics, all wrapped in stunning Italian design.

details
0c4a02aa-7ef0-4741-9475-1e235af2781d

Reviews Ferrari 296 Coupe

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Toyota C-HR
VS
Renault Arkana and Toyota C-HR go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Renault Arkana or the …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Arkana
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Nissan Qashqai stands out with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana offers a more stylish coupe-SUV design, appealing to those looking for a distinctive aesthetic without …
Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Rafale represent two different takes on Renault's crossover line-up: the Arkana is a compact, value-focused coupe-SUV, while the Rafale aims higher as a larger, more premium fastback crossover packed with technology. This comparison strips away the marketing to help …
Ford Kuga
Renault Arkana
VS
In the competitive crossover SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Renault Arkana present two distinct approaches to style and capability. The Ford Kuga impresses with its versatile engine options and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for family-oriented buyers. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana …
Kia Sportage
Renault Arkana
VS
Kia Sportage and Renault Arkana go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Kia Sportage or the …
CUPRA Formentor
Renault Arkana
VS
CUPRA Formentor and Renault Arkana go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the CUPRA Formentor or …
Hyundai Kona
Renault Arkana
VS
Hyundai Kona and Renault Arkana go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Hyundai Kona or the …
Kia Niro
Renault Arkana
VS
In the competitive crossover market, the Kia Niro and Renault Arkana both offer distinct advantages. The Kia Niro stands out with its impressive fuel efficiency and eco-friendly hybrid and electric options, catering to environmentally conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana captivates with …
Renault Arkana
Ferrari 296 Coupe

Costs and Consumption
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Price
348,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
8.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
15 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
106 g/km
co2
218 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Coupe
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Curb weight
1,670 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,821 mm
Width
1,958 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
451 kg
Payload
225 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
143 HP
Power HP
880 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 Nm
Torque
755 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
6
Power kW
105 kW
Power kW
648 kW
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
2,992 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Renault
Brand
Ferrari
What drive types are available for the Renault Arkana?

The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.