Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Renault Arkana vs Ford Mustang Mach-E comparison
Compare performance (143 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Ford Mustang Mach-E?
Renault Arkana vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Arkana
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Arkana is substantially cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,971 £.
Mustang Mach-E
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers substantially more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 344 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers significantly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 745 Nm more.
Arkana
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is significantly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 651 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries only slightly more – 451 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Renault Arkana
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
Renault Arkana
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.