VS

Renault Arkana vs GWM ORA 05 comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 160 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 23,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or GWM ORA 05?

Renault Arkana vs GWM ORA 05: Key differences

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more efficient
  • only slightly lighter
details

GWM ORA 05

  • noticeably cheaper
  • a bit more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Arkana

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

GWM ORA 05 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,323 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the GWM ORA 05 with 6.9 L/100km. The difference is about 2.2 L/100km.

ORA 05

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the GWM ORA 05 offers a bit more power – delivering 160 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 17 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the GWM ORA 05 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 9.3 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the GWM ORA 05 delivers clearly more torque with 270 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm more.

Arkana

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is only slightly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,560 kg. The difference is around 50 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries clearly more – 451 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 91 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Arkana leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £28,500
Arkana

Renault Arkana

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.7 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG MG4 Urban
GWM ORA 05
VS
Comparing the MG4 Urban and the ORA 05 puts a sporty, tech-packed MG4 up against GWM’s stylish ORA 05 to see which electric compact better suits your needs. I’ll highlight the key differences in range, driving feel, interior space and features so you can pick the one that matches your priorities.
BYD Atto 2
GWM ORA 05
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 2 and the GWM ORA 05 helps you choose between two compact electric crossovers that blend bold styling, modern tech and city-friendly practicality. I'll highlight where each excels — range, interior comfort, driving feel and overall value — so you can pick the one that best …
Renault Arkana
GWM ORA 05

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

GWM ORA 05

The ORA 05 is a stylish electric hatch that mixes playful, modern styling with a well-finished cabin aimed at urban drivers. It delivers comfortable, composed city driving and sensible practicality, making it a compelling choice for buyers who want an easy-to-live-with, characterful EV.

details
IMG_3966
gwm-ora-5-2026 (2)
gwm-ora-5-2026 (1)

Reviews GWM ORA 05

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Leapmotor B10
GWM ORA 05
VS
Comparing the Leapmotor B10 and the ORA 05 puts two compact electric contenders side by side: the B10 leans toward roomy comfort and advanced driver-tech, while the ORA 05 prioritizes distinctive styling and value. Choose the B10 if you want a quieter, more upmarket driving experience with stronger …
GWM ORA 03
GWM ORA 05
VS
The GWM ORA 03 and ORA 05 are two compact electric models from Great Wall Motors’ ORA family aimed at different buyers: the ORA 03 is the more city-oriented, value-focused option, while the ORA 05 leans toward a slightly larger, more refined and feature-rich package. Below I’ll break down the key …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Arkana
VS
The Qashqai and Arkana are two compact SUVs that take different approaches: the Qashqai focuses on everyday practicality and comfort, while the Arkana trades a bit of rear space for a sportier, coupe-like profile and distinctive style. I’ll compare them on the things that matter—space and …
GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro
GWM ORA 05
VS
GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro and GWM ORA 05 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the GWM HAVAL Jolion …
MG MGS5 EV
GWM ORA 05
VS
MG MGS5 EV vs ORA 05 — two fresh electric compact crossovers that aim at the same buyers: style-conscious city drivers who want low running costs and decent tech without luxury-car prices. This comparison walks through the key differences so you can decide which one fits your priorities: range and …
Leapmotor B05
GWM ORA 05
VS
Leapmotor B05 and GWM ORA 05 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Leapmotor B05 or the GWM …
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
Choosing between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Austral comes down to whether you want a coupe‑styled compact SUV that prioritises flair and efficiency (Arkana) or a more conventional family SUV that emphasises space and refinement (Austral). This comparison will cut through the marketing to …
Renault Arkana
GWM ORA 05

Costs and Consumption
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Price
23,100 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
106 g/km
co2
158 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Curb weight
1,560 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
422 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,821 mm
Width
1,833 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
451 kg
Payload
360 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
143 HP
Power HP
160 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 Nm
Torque
270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
105 kW
Power kW
118 kW
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Renault
Brand
GWM
What drive types are available for the Renault Arkana?

The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.