Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Renault Arkana vs MG HS comparison
Compare performance (143 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (28500 £ vs 30000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or MG HS?
Renault Arkana vs MG HS: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Arkana
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Arkana has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28500 £ , while the MG HS costs 30000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1534 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MG HS manages with 0.50 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.70 L. The difference is about 4.20 L per 100 km.
HS
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the MG HS has a clearly edge – offering 272 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 129 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG HS is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 4 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: MG HS pulls clearly stronger with 350 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 145 Nm difference.
Arkana
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Renault Arkana is somewhat lighter – 1510 kg compared to 1735 kg. The difference is around 225 kg.
When it comes to payload, Renault Arkana somewhat takes the win – 451 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 51 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MG HS is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Renault Arkana
MG HS
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £30,000
MG HS
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
MG HS
5 (1 Reviews)
The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.
details
Renault Arkana
MG HS
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28500 - 31900 £
|
Price
30000 - 36000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 5.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
100 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
14 - 126 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1510 kg
|
Curb weight
1735 - 1930 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
507 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1821 mm
|
Width
1890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
400 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
224 - 272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
340 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
165 - 200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1496 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
MG
|
What drivetrain options does the Renault Arkana have?
The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.