Compare performance (143 HP vs 178 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 28,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Toyota Corolla?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving automotive landscape, two models have emerged as formidable contenders in their respective categories: the Renault Arkana and the Toyota Corolla. This article delves into the distinctive features, technical specifications, and innovations of these vehicles, helping potential buyers make an informed decision.
The Renault Arkana straddles the line between SUV and coupe, offering the elevated stance and spaciousness of an SUV with the sleek silhouette of a coupe. Its body dimensions—4568 mm in length, 1821 mm wide, and 1576 mm in height—provide a roomy interior and commanding road presence.
In contrast, the Toyota Corolla presents a classic hatchback design—compact and versatile. Measuring 4370 mm in length, 1790 mm width, and 1435 mm height, the Corolla is tailored for urban agility, making it ideal for city driving environments.
Under the hood, the Arkana offers a choice between Full Hybrid and Petrol MHEV engines. The variants deliver between 140 to 158 HP, accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 9.1 seconds, with a maximum speed reaching up to 174 km/h. Its fuel efficiency ranges from 4.7 to 6 L/100 km, backed by a hybrid battery with a capacity of 0.6 kWh.
On the other hand, the Corolla Hybrid comes with a powerful yet efficient engine option delivering 140 to a robust 196 HP. The Corolla hits the 100 km/h mark in a swift 7.5 seconds, boasting a top speed of 180 km/h. Its exemplary fuel economy, averaging between 4.4 to 4.6 L/100 km, underscores its eco-friendly credentials.
The Renault Arkana is equipped with an automatic transmission, offering both an Automatic Gearbox and a Dual-Clutch Automatic setup. This model strictly adheres to Front-Wheel Drive (FWD), ensuring steady and reliable handling.
Similarly, the Toyota Corolla employs a CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission) and also features Front-Wheel Drive. This complements its hybrid engineering, delivering a seamless and efficient driving experience.
Both the Arkana and Corolla offer seating for five, emphasizing comfort and space optimization. The Arkana leads with a generous trunk capacity of up to 513 L, which is particularly appealing for those with active lifestyles or families needing extra cargo space.
The Corolla, while compact, provides a trunk capacity ranging between 313 and 361 L, which is adequate for everyday needs. The Corolla's interior design shines in its efficient use of space, highlighting functionality without compromising style.
When evaluating environmental impact, both models perform admirably. The Arkana maintains a CO2 emission level between 106 and 135 g/km, while the Corolla keeps emissions at 100 g/km. Both vehicles are classified under the CO2 Efficiency Class 'C', emphasizing their efforts toward minimizing environmental footprints.
The choice between the Renault Arkana and the Toyota Corolla ultimately depends on individual needs and preferences. The Arkana is well-suited for those desiring the robustness of an SUV combined with performance-driven features. In contrast, the Corolla appeals to those prioritizing compact efficiency and advanced hybrid technology. Both vehicles represent significant advancements in automotive design and engineering, ensuring driving experiences that cater to diverse lifestyle demands.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Arkana is only slightly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Toyota Corolla costs 28,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 120 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota Corolla uses 4.4 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Corolla offers moderately more power – delivering 178 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 35 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota Corolla is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.5 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota Corolla is very slightly lighter – 1,420 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 90 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries barely more – 451 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.
The Toyota Corolla is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.
details
The Corolla is a reliable, no-nonsense compact car known for its practicality and composed ride. It’s economical to run, easy to maintain, and suits daily commuting while holding its value well.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
Price
28,600 - 34,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
100 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,460 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
313 - 361 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,370 mm
|
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
Width
1,790 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,435 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,004 - 1,052 L
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
400 - 450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 178 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.5 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 131 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España