Compare performance (143 HP vs 178 HP), boot space and price (28500 £ vs 28600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Toyota Corolla?
In the ever-evolving automotive landscape, two models have emerged as formidable contenders in their respective categories: the Renault Arkana and the Toyota Corolla. This article delves into the distinctive features, technical specifications, and innovations of these vehicles, helping potential buyers make an informed decision.
The Renault Arkana straddles the line between SUV and coupe, offering the elevated stance and spaciousness of an SUV with the sleek silhouette of a coupe. Its body dimensions—4568 mm in length, 1821 mm wide, and 1576 mm in height—provide a roomy interior and commanding road presence.
In contrast, the Toyota Corolla presents a classic hatchback design—compact and versatile. Measuring 4370 mm in length, 1790 mm width, and 1435 mm height, the Corolla is tailored for urban agility, making it ideal for city driving environments.
Under the hood, the Arkana offers a choice between Full Hybrid and Petrol MHEV engines. The variants deliver between 140 to 158 HP, accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 9.1 seconds, with a maximum speed reaching up to 174 km/h. Its fuel efficiency ranges from 4.7 to 6 L/100 km, backed by a hybrid battery with a capacity of 0.6 kWh.
On the other hand, the Corolla Hybrid comes with a powerful yet efficient engine option delivering 140 to a robust 196 HP. The Corolla hits the 100 km/h mark in a swift 7.5 seconds, boasting a top speed of 180 km/h. Its exemplary fuel economy, averaging between 4.4 to 4.6 L/100 km, underscores its eco-friendly credentials.
The Renault Arkana is equipped with an automatic transmission, offering both an Automatic Gearbox and a Dual-Clutch Automatic setup. This model strictly adheres to Front-Wheel Drive (FWD), ensuring steady and reliable handling.
Similarly, the Toyota Corolla employs a CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission) and also features Front-Wheel Drive. This complements its hybrid engineering, delivering a seamless and efficient driving experience.
Both the Arkana and Corolla offer seating for five, emphasizing comfort and space optimization. The Arkana leads with a generous trunk capacity of up to 513 L, which is particularly appealing for those with active lifestyles or families needing extra cargo space.
The Corolla, while compact, provides a trunk capacity ranging between 313 and 361 L, which is adequate for everyday needs. The Corolla's interior design shines in its efficient use of space, highlighting functionality without compromising style.
When evaluating environmental impact, both models perform admirably. The Arkana maintains a CO2 emission level between 106 and 135 g/km, while the Corolla keeps emissions at 100 g/km. Both vehicles are classified under the CO2 Efficiency Class 'C', emphasizing their efforts toward minimizing environmental footprints.
The choice between the Renault Arkana and the Toyota Corolla ultimately depends on individual needs and preferences. The Arkana is well-suited for those desiring the robustness of an SUV combined with performance-driven features. In contrast, the Corolla appeals to those prioritizing compact efficiency and advanced hybrid technology. Both vehicles represent significant advancements in automotive design and engineering, ensuring driving experiences that cater to diverse lifestyle demands.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Renault Arkana has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28500 £ , while the Toyota Corolla costs 28600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 120 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota Corolla manages with 4.40 L and is therefore minimal more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.70 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Corolla has a to a small extent edge – offering 178 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 35 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota Corolla is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.50 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 3.30 s faster.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Toyota Corolla is barely noticeable lighter – 1420 kg compared to 1510 kg. The difference is around 90 kg.
When it comes to payload, Renault Arkana slight takes the win – 451 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.
The Toyota Corolla holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
The Toyota Corolla remains the steady, no-nonsense compact that puts reliability and low running costs at the top of your shopping list, with a comfortable, well-built interior that won't embarrass you at the supermarket. It won't set your pulse racing, but it's an honest, easy-to-live-with car that makes smart sense for buyers who want dependability and sensible value with a dash of modern tech.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28500 - 31900 £
|
Price
28600 - 34900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.40 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
100 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1510 kg
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1460 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
313 - 361 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4370 mm
|
|
Width
1821 mm
|
Width
1790 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1435 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1004 - 1052 L
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
400 - 450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 178 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.5 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 131 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1798 - 1987 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Toyota
|
The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España