Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Renault Arkana vs Volvo XC60 comparison
Compare performance (143 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 49,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Volvo XC60?
Renault Arkana vs Volvo XC60: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Arkana
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Renault Arkana is significantly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,734 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 2.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.
XC60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers considerably more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 312 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 5.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers significantly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 504 Nm more.
Arkana
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is clearly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 390 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries a bit more – 550 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 99 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo XC60 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £49,200
Volvo XC60
Renault Arkana
Volvo XC60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Volvo XC60
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.
details
Renault Arkana
Volvo XC60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
Price
49,200 - 75,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
64 - 169 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,708 mm
|
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
Width
1,902 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,655 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,543 L
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
510 - 550 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.