VS

Renault Captur vs Hyundai Kona comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 23,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Captur or Hyundai Kona?

Renault Captur vs Hyundai Kona: Key differences

Renault Captur

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • barely lighter
details

Hyundai Kona

4.4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Captur

Quick take: Hyundai Kona and Renault Captur face off

Hyundai Kona and Renault Captur begin this compact‑SUV comparison from very different starting points: the Kona plays the roomy, comfort‑first allrounder while the Captur leans into interior flexibility and digital convenience. This head‑to‑head of Hyundai Kona VS Renault Captur is about trade‑offs — a bigger boot and more composed ride versus a sliding rear bench and Google‑centric infotainment. Buyers who prize straightforward ergonomics and efficient electrified options will feel the Kona’s strengths immediately. Those who want clever packaging, lower entry price and seamless smartphone services will find the Captur more persuasive.

Kona

Character and driving feel

The Hyundai Kona drives like a confident, adult compact SUV: predictable steering, a calm ride and a chassis that soaks up town imperfections without drama. The Renault Captur is quieter in everyday use, especially in its hybrid form, and the steering is tuned for relaxed, effortless progress rather than sporty engagement. Kona offers the livelier power option in the line‑up, so it feels brisker off the line and on ramps; Captur trades outright punch for refined cruising and a softer, more sedate personality. In short, choose the Kona if you want a bit more shove and composure, pick the Captur if you prefer hushed, unhurried progress.

Captur

Comfort and long‑distance behaviour

On longer runs the Kona’s suspension and seating balance bias comfort: it settles on coarser road surfaces and the cabin layout stays user‑friendly over hours behind the wheel. The Captur impresses with its near‑silent highway manners in hybrid form, making fatigue‑free motorway miles a real selling point. Kona’s advantage in luggage space and a more practical tailgate layout means it handles family trips and weekend loads with less fuss than the Captur’s higher load sill. Conversely, Captur’s sliding rear bench gives rear passengers or cargo a quick flexibility that Kona can’t match unless you opt for higher trims with special seat splits.

Kona

City life and everyday usability

In town the Kona feels especially nimble and easy to park thanks to a light steering setup and clear controls that don’t demand constant reaching for menus. The Captur masks its footprint well and its sliding rear seat and modular boot make it very clever when you need to switch between passengers and shopping runs. Kona’s tactile buttons and readable screens are a relief during stop‑start driving, whereas Captur’s more digital interface and fewer physical knobs can be slick but sometimes fussy when you just want to change a setting quickly. If your daily routine mixes tight parking, frequent loading and tech‑centric features, Captur’s versatility and Google ecosystem win points, while Kona keeps the day simple and undemanding.

Captur

Cabin feel and perceived quality

The Renault Captur presents a more modern, design‑forward cabin at first glance, with upper surfaces that feel pleasant to touch and a large connected screen that gives the interior a contemporary edge. The Hyundai Kona counters with a clean, driver‑friendly cockpit where physical controls and logical menus reduce distraction and feel more durable in daily use. Both cars use some harder plastics in lower zones, but the Captur’s trimmed upper areas lift perceived quality while the Kona’s wider armrest and storage layout often feel more usable for families. For buyers sensitive to tactile refinement the Captur will read as slightly more premium; for those who prioritise ergonomics and everyday toughness, the Kona will feel smarter in practice.

Kona

Who each car suits — a buyer‑fit contrast

If your priority is space, straightforward controls and an efficient electrified option for city and regional driving, the Hyundai Kona will likely align with your needs and habits. If you value modularity, the newest connected infotainment and a lower price of entry while accepting a few compromises in rear visibility and loading height, the Renault Captur is the smarter urban family pick. Both are practical compact SUVs, but the Kona skews toward families wanting loadspace and calm ergonomics, while the Captur targets tech‑minded urban families who prize flexibility and a quiet hybrid ride. Below this editorial comparison we’ll walk through the technical differences so you can see how those real‑world traits map to engines, dimensions and equipment lines.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Captur

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault Captur is only slightly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Hyundai Kona costs 23,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,672 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Captur uses 4.4 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Hyundai Kona with 4.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

Kona

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers noticeably more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 46 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Renault Captur takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

Both models offer the same torque – 265 Nm.

Captur

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Captur is barely lighter – 1,323 kg compared to 1,370 kg. The difference is around 47 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers barely more boot space – 466 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 44 L.

When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries barely more – 490 kg compared to 453 kg. That’s a difference of about 37 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,100
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 380 - 510 km
Renault Captur
Hyundai Kona

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Renault Captur

The Renault Captur is a stylish and practical compact crossover that combines a high seating position and easy manoeuvrability with a comfortable, well‑equipped cabin. Its flexible interior layout and modern infotainment make it a sensible, polished choice for city drivers and small families.

details

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona is a compact crossover that pairs bold styling with practical everyday usability, offering a comfortable cabin and intuitive tech for modern drivers. Available in both conventional and electrified versions, Kona brings lively handling and strong value for buyers who want crossover versatility and standout character.

details
Renault Captur
Hyundai Kona

Costs and Consumption

Price
21,400 - 28,400 £
Price
23,100 - 41,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
100 - 137 g/km
co2
0 - 163 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,797 mm
Width
1,825 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
447 - 453 kg
Payload
420 - 490 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
Brand
Renault
Brand
Hyundai
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.