VS

Renault Captur vs MG Cyberster comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 510 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 55,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Captur or MG Cyberster?

Renault Captur vs MG Cyberster: Key differences

Renault Captur

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • substantially lighter
  • substantially more trunk space
details

MG Cyberster

  • significantly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Captur

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Captur is considerably cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the MG Cyberster costs 55,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 34,320 £.

Cyberster

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MG Cyberster offers significantly more power – delivering 510 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 352 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG Cyberster is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.2 s, while the Renault Captur takes 8.9 s. That’s about 5.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Cyberster delivers clearly more torque with 725 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 460 Nm more.

Captur

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Renault Captur offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Captur is substantially lighter – 1,323 kg compared to 1,960 kg. The difference is around 637 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Captur offers substantially more boot space – 422 L compared to 200 L. That’s a difference of about 222 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Captur carries substantially more – 453 kg compared to 150 kg. That’s a difference of about 303 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG Cyberster stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £55,700
Cyberster

MG Cyberster

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 340 - 510 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 443 - 507 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
Renault Symbioz
VS
Captur and Symbioz showcase two very different Renault directions: Captur is a practical compact crossover focused on everyday comfort, economy and usability, while Symbioz is a forward‑looking concept exploring electric power, autonomous driving and living‑space ideas. This short comparison will …
Renault Captur
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Renault Captur and Toyota Yaris Cross are two popular compact crossovers that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling, practicality and efficient powertrains. The Captur leans on bold design and flexible interior space, while the Yaris Cross prioritizes hybrid efficiency, Toyota’s …
Renault Captur
MG Cyberster

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Captur

The Renault Captur is a stylish and practical compact crossover that combines a high seating position and easy manoeuvrability with a comfortable, well‑equipped cabin. Its flexible interior layout and modern infotainment make it a sensible, polished choice for city drivers and small families.

details
r210470p
r210480p
r210476p
r210485p

Reviews Renault Captur

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
Lüsi
15 May 2026, 16:11:37

More affordable, high-level infotainment and better quality — good value for money.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Pet
4 Feb 2026, 11:01:12

The car was a very pleasant surprise. Very comfortable and enjoyable. The 1.3 TCe 158 hp engine is brilliant.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Waldemar
1 Feb 2026, 13:55:20

A 2025 mild‑hybrid, 160 hp.
Really nice little car. Mostly doing 200 km trips. Driving isn’t tiring. I trusted the driver‑assistance systems and… I wasn’t disappointed. The adaptive cruise control is brilliant, though I’d trust it about 90%. Overtaking punch is a plus. I recommend it with a clear conscience. Ah, just those 18" wheels 🤦. Obviously fuel consumption is higher because it’s an automatic.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

MG Cyberster

The Cyberster is a striking new addition to the electric vehicle landscape, captivating enthusiasts with its sleek design and sporty silhouette. This all-electric convertible combines innovative technology with an exhilarating driving experience, making it a standout choice for those who crave adventure. With its commitment to sustainability and performance, the Cyberster is poised to redefine the way we think about modern roadsters.

details
serpimg_kJiKA7

Reviews MG Cyberster

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
SEAT Arona
VS
The Renault Captur and SEAT Arona are two of Europe’s most popular compact crossovers, each offering a city-friendly footprint with raised driving position and SUV styling. This short comparison focuses on practicality, driving character, running costs and feature value to help you pick the one …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Captur
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stays the sensible family favourite — roomier, better built and more composed on the motorway, so it’s the pick if you value comfort and practicality without drama. The Renault Captur, meanwhile, charms with bolder styling, clever packaging and nippier city manners (usually for …
Dacia Sandero
Renault Captur
VS
Choosing between the Dacia Sandero and the Renault Captur comes down to whether you prioritise affordable, no-nonsense practicality or a more refined, crossover-style package with extra equipment. The Sandero delivers exceptional value and low running costs, while the Captur offers more comfort, …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Citroen C3
Renault Captur
VS
Choosing between the Citroën C3 and the Renault Captur comes down to whether you want a compact, comfort-focused hatch with quirky styling or a slightly larger, more versatile crossover with a higher driving position. I’ll compare practicality, fuel economy, driving feel and value so you can pick …
Renault Captur
Renault Mégane
VS
Small, raised and city-savvy, the Renault Captur is the compact crossover for shoppers who want higher seating, flexible space and an easygoing ride; the Renault Mégane, by contrast, is a sharper hatch that rewards drivers with crisper handling and a more planted feel. If your life is school runs …
Dacia Duster
Renault Captur
VS
Choosing between the Dacia Duster and the Renault Captur comes down to whether you prioritise rugged value or urban refinement. The Duster is a no‑nonsense, spacious SUV with strong off‑road ability and low running costs, while the Captur focuses on stylish design, a smoother on‑road ride and more …
Fiat 600
Renault Captur
VS
The Fiat 600, renowned for its compact dimensions and urban-friendly design, offers a unique retro charm with modern technology to appeal to city dwellers. In contrast, the Renault Captur stands out in the subcompact SUV category with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it an …
Renault Captur
MG Cyberster

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 28,600 £
Price
55,700 - 60,000 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
443 - 507 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
100 - 137 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Roadster
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
Curb weight
1,960 - 2,060 kg
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
200 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,797 mm
Width
1,913 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
447 - 453 kg
Payload
150 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
340 - 510 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.2 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
Torque
475 - 725 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
250 - 375 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Renault
Brand
MG
What drivetrain options does the Renault Captur have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.