VS

Renault Captur vs Nissan Juke comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Captur or Nissan Juke?

Renault Captur vs Nissan Juke: Key differences

Renault Captur

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Captur

Overview: Nissan Juke VS Renault Captur – two different takes on the compact SUV

Nissan Juke VS Renault Captur sets up an immediate contrast: the Nissan Juke leans into bold styling and a driver‑centric cockpit while the Renault Captur pitches versatility, quietness and tech in a more conventional package. The Nissan Juke feels youthful and city‑focused, rewarding short trips with nimble steering and tactile controls, whereas the Renault Captur emphasises relaxed progress, interior flexibility and an infotainment experience built around Google services. Both cars aim at the same small‑SUV slot, but they appeal to different priorities — standout personality versus calm practicality. Read on for how those character differences play out where it matters day to day.

Juke

Driving character: city agility versus composed cruising

The Nissan Juke makes its strengths obvious in town — light steering, quick turn‑in and a punchy, engaging feel that turns parking and lane changes into a small pleasure. The Renault Captur, by contrast, is tuned for composure: the steering and suspension favour calm, predictable responses that make motorway miles less tiring. In mixed driving the Captur’s hybrid setup often feels stronger and more effortless when you ask for acceleration, while the Juke’s transmissions can be brisk but occasionally abrupt in stop‑and‑go traffic. That trade‑off means the Juke is more fun and nimble around urban obstacles, while the Captur rewards longer trips with a steadier, less vocal demeanour.

Captur

Cabin comfort and perceived quality: driver focus against refined calm

Step into the Nissan Juke and the cockpit grabs you: driver‑oriented layout, a large screen angled toward the wheel, and physical climate controls that make immediate adjustments simple. The Renault Captur trades some of that tactile drama for a quieter, more grown‑up cabin where materials and trims feel a touch more refined and the overall ambience is calmer on long runs. On noise and refinement the Captur has the edge, especially in hybrid variants that glide through town; the Juke can feel livelier but transmits more tyre and wind noise at higher speeds or on larger wheels. Both cabins have trade‑offs in visibility and rear‑seat convenience, but the Captur’s softer acoustic environment makes the interior feel more relaxing day after day.

Juke

Practicality and everyday usability: modular flexibility versus compact cleverness

The Renault Captur’s real advantage lies in its practical tricks — a sliding rear bench and a configurable load floor that mean the car adapts to passengers or cargo without drama. The Nissan Juke keeps a strong urban case with compact exterior dimensions and a sensibly sized boot on petrol variants, yet its high loading lip and tighter rear space are constant reminders of the design compromises. Families or anyone regularly juggling prams, boxes or variable passenger loads will find the Captur’s modularity easier to live with, while buyers prioritising a small footprint and visual flair may accept the Juke’s compromises. In short, the Captur stretches usefulness across more daily situations; the Juke concentrates utility into a smaller, more style‑driven package.

Captur

Tech, infotainment and driver aids: tactile immediacy vs digital convenience

The Nissan Juke scores with a crisp, driver‑facing screen and a dash of physical controls that keep frequently used functions at your fingertips, which feels reassuring on a busy commute. The Renault Captur pushes the digital envelope with a Google‑centred system and a large, intuitive display that simplifies navigation, voice control and map updates but relies more on touchscreen interaction. Both cars offer generous assistance packages, yet the Captur’s systems are tuned toward convenience and automation for long drives, while the Juke’s features complement its city‑oriented agility. Choosing between them here is a matter of preference: want physical knobs and immediacy (Juke) or a seamless connected platform (Captur)?

Juke

Buyer fit: who should test which car first

If you spend most of your time in the city, prize personality and enjoy a compact, lively car, the Nissan Juke suits that urban lifestyle and makes daily driving feel less routine. If your priority is family flexibility, low cabin noise on long commutes and an infotainment suite that integrates with your phone life, the Renault Captur answers those needs with pragmatic versatility. Buyers who split time between short hops and motorway work will want to weigh the Juke’s city efficiency against the Captur’s more composed long‑distance manners and stronger midrange urge. The next section drills into the technical differences that create these real‑world contrasts so you can translate them into the best choice for your driving pattern.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Captur is the practical, pocket-sized crossover that balances frugal running costs, clever packaging and everyday comfort — the sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. By contrast the Renault Symbioz is a bold electric concept, part living room, part lab car, …
Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Captur

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Both models are evenly matched in price – each starts at 21,400 £ .

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Captur uses 4.4 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Nissan Juke with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

Juke

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Captur offers barely more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 15 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Captur is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.9 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Captur delivers visibly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm more.

Captur

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is marginally lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,323 kg. The difference is around 49 kg.

Boot capacity is identical – both offer 422 L of storage.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Captur carries only slightly more – 453 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 26 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Captur is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
Captur

Renault Captur

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6 L/100km
details
Renault Captur
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Captur

The Renault Captur is a stylish and practical compact crossover that combines a high seating position and easy manoeuvrability with a comfortable, well‑equipped cabin. Its flexible interior layout and modern infotainment make it a sensible, polished choice for city drivers and small families.

details
r210470p
r210480p
r210476p
r210485p

Reviews Renault Captur

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Lüsi
15 May 2026, 16:11:37

More affordable, high-level infotainment and better quality — good value for money.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Pet
4 Feb 2026, 11:01:12

The car was a very pleasant surprise. Very comfortable and enjoyable. The 1.3 TCe 158 hp engine is brilliant.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Waldemar
1 Feb 2026, 13:55:20

A 2025 mild‑hybrid, 160 hp.
Really nice little car. Mostly doing 200 km trips. Driving isn’t tiring. I trusted the driver‑assistance systems and… I wasn’t disappointed. The adaptive cruise control is brilliant, though I’d trust it about 90%. Overtaking punch is a plus. I recommend it with a clear conscience. Ah, just those 18" wheels 🤦. Obviously fuel consumption is higher because it’s an automatic.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
SEAT Arona
VS
The Renault Captur and SEAT Arona are two of Europe’s most popular compact crossovers, each offering a city-friendly footprint with raised driving position and SUV styling. This short comparison focuses on practicality, driving character, running costs and feature value to help you pick the one …
Dacia Sandero
Renault Captur
VS
The Dacia Sandero is the no-nonsense value king—spacious, economical and brutally practical for buyers who want transport, not trinkets. The Renault Captur, by contrast, bundles sharper styling, more tech and a cosier cabin into a compact SUV package, so you pay extra for polish and personality.
Nissan Juke
Opel Corsa
VS
The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …
Renault Captur
Renault Mégane
VS
Small, raised and city-savvy, the Renault Captur is the compact crossover for shoppers who want higher seating, flexible space and an easygoing ride; the Renault Mégane, by contrast, is a sharper hatch that rewards drivers with crisper handling and a more planted feel. If your life is school runs …
Citroen C3
Renault Captur
VS
Choosing between the Citroën C3 and the Renault Captur comes down to whether you want a compact, comfort-focused hatch with quirky styling or a slightly larger, more versatile crossover with a higher driving position. I’ll compare practicality, fuel economy, driving feel and value so you can pick …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Renault Captur
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the compact crossover duel, the Renault Captur charms with bold styling, a roomy, customisable interior and punchy petrol or hybrid engines, while the Toyota Yaris Cross plays the long game with Toyota’s trademark reliability, clever packaging and class-leading hybrid fuel economy. If you want …
Nissan Juke
SEAT Arona
VS
The Nissan Juke and SEAT Arona are rival compact crossovers that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling, yet they take markedly different approaches to design, driving feel and practicality. This comparison highlights the key strengths and compromises of each so you can quickly decide …
Renault Captur
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 28,400 £
Price
21,400 - 31,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
100 - 137 g/km
co2
105 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,797 mm
Width
1,800 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
447 - 453 kg
Payload
405 - 427 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
Torque
200 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
Brand
Renault
Brand
Nissan
What drivetrain options does the Renault Captur have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.