VS

Renault Clio vs Suzuki Across comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (17,100 £ vs 49,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Clio or Suzuki Across?

Renault Clio vs Suzuki Across: Key differences

Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • significantly lighter
details

Suzuki Across

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Clio

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Clio is considerably cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Suzuki Across costs 49,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 32,820 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Across uses 1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Renault Clio with 4.1 L/100km. The difference is about 3.1 L/100km.

Across

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Across offers substantially more power – delivering 306 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 148 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Across is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.

Clio

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is significantly lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 2,075 kg. The difference is around 873 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Across offers markedly more boot space – 490 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 163 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries barely more – 463 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 28 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Suzuki Across is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

£49,877
Across

Suzuki Across

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 306 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 75 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Across
VS
Here’s a straight-talk comparison of the Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Across to help you decide which crossover suits your lifestyle and budget. The S-Cross is a practical, affordable compact crossover focused on efficiency and comfort, while the Across is a larger plug-in hybrid with stronger …
Suzuki Vitara
Suzuki Across
VS
Here’s a matchup: the compact, city-friendly Suzuki Vitara squares off against the RAV4-based Suzuki Across to settle whether you want sprightly urban agility or long-range hybrid practicality. The Vitara tempts with a cheeky drive and sensible price, while the Across answers with superior fuel …
Renault Clio
Suzuki Across

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki Across

The Suzuki Across is Suzuki's take on a roomy, efficient plug-in SUV handed down from its Toyota cousin, marrying sensible practicality with a polished, grown-up driving character. It won't thrill those chasing sporty drama, but for buyers who value measured refinement, low running costs and lots of usable space, it's an unexpectedly accomplished and subtly premium package.

details
Across_überarbeitet_1
Across_überarbeitet_4

Reviews Suzuki Across

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Across
Toyota RAV4
VS
Choosing between the Suzuki Across and the Toyota RAV4 comes down to whether you prioritise an efficient plug‑in hybrid or a more conventional, broader compact SUV package. The Across is Suzuki’s take on the RAV4 PHEV with strong electric range and fuel economy, while the RAV4 offers a wider model …
Kia Picanto
Renault Clio
VS
The Kia Picanto and Renault Clio are popular choices in the small-car market, but they suit different needs: the Picanto excels as an ultra-compact, easy-to-park city car with strong value, while the Clio offers more space, refinement and equipment for everyday family use. If you prioritise low …
Nissan Juke
Renault Clio
VS
Choosing between the Juke and the Clio comes down to whether you want a compact crossover with bold styling and a higher driving position or a polished, practical hatchback focused on everyday usability. If you prioritise standout looks and a more commanding ride go for the Juke; if you want …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
City supermini buyers face a tasty dilemma: the Citroën C3 charms with cosy ride comfort, playful looks and practical flair, while the Renault Clio answers with sharper handling, a more premium cabin and smarter tech. Choose the C3 if you prioritise comfort and personality; pick the Clio if you …
Renault Clio
VW Polo
VS
The Renault Clio and VW Polo are two of Europe's best-selling superminis, each offering smart styling, efficient engines and practical interiors. This comparison focuses on real-world driving, interior space, running costs and tech to help you pick which small car suits you best.
Suzuki Across
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Suzuki Across and the Toyota Corolla Cross (commonly called the Corolla Cross) are compact crossover SUVs that blend hybrid efficiency with practical, family-friendly packaging. I’ll compare their driving feel, interior space, equipment and running costs to help you pick the one that suits your …
MG MG3
Renault Clio
VS
The MG3 and Clio are both small hatchbacks aimed at buyers wanting an affordable, city-friendly car, but they take different approaches to style, equipment and driving character. This comparison looks at where the MG3’s value-focused simplicity stacks up against the Clio’s sharper handling, nicer …
Renault Clio
Suzuki Across

Costs and Consumption
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Price
49,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
75 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
92 - 118 g/km
co2
22 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Curb weight
2,075 kg
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Trunk capacity
490 L
Length
-
Length
4,635 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Width
1,855 mm
Height
-
Height
1,690 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,604 L
Payload
453 - 463 kg
Payload
435 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
306 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
190 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
225 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
2,487 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Renault
Brand
Suzuki
What drivetrain options does the Renault Clio have?

The Renault Clio is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.