Compare performance (130 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (25700 £ vs 21200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Kangoo or Toyota Proace City Compact Van?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Toyota Proace City Compact Van has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21200 £ , while the Renault Kangoo costs 25700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4534 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Kangoo manages with 5.20 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Toyota Proace City Compact Van with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.20 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Toyota Proace City Compact Van: with 18.50 kWh per 100 km, it’s slight more efficient than the Renault Kangoo with 20.20 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.70 kWh.
As for electric range, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van performs slightly better – achieving up to 337 km, about 52 km more than the Renault Kangoo.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van has a slight edge – offering 136 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 6 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 11.10 s, while the Renault Kangoo takes 11.60 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 186 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo tops out at 135 km/h. The difference is around 51 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Toyota Proace City Compact Van pulls barely noticeable stronger with 300 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Renault Kangoo offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Toyota Proace City Compact Van is barely noticeable lighter – 1358 kg compared to 1489 kg. The difference is around 131 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van performs clearly perceptible better – up to 4300 L, which is about 1250 L more than the Renault Kangoo.
When it comes to payload, Toyota Proace City Compact Van noticeable takes the win – 921 kg compared to 610 kg. That’s a difference of about 311 kg.
The Toyota Proace City Compact Van holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Kangoo is the pragmatic chameleon of small vans, marrying van-like practicality with carlike comfort and a cheerful, friendly face that suits both family runs and workday hauls. It's sensible, versatile and annoyingly useful — easy to live with, cheap to run and clever where it counts, so you get more space and fewer compromises than the price suggests.
detailsThe Toyota Proace City Compact Van is a city-savvy workhorse that packs surprising practicality and smart packaging into a friendly, easy-to-drive package. It’s the kind of van that gets the job done without fuss — reliable, economical and just sensible enough to make fleet managers smile.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25700 - 36200 £
|
Price
21200 - 37700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6.6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.2 - 21.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.50 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
278 - 285 km
|
Electric Range
337 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 168 g/km
|
co2
0 - 150 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 61 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1489 - 2041 kg
|
Curb weight
1358 - 1837 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 950 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4486 - 4911 mm
|
Length
4401 - 4751 mm
|
|
Width
1860 - 1919 mm
|
Width
1848 mm
|
|
Height
1838 - 1869 mm
|
Height
1860 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2500 - 3050 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3300 - 4300 L
|
|
Payload
459 - 610 kg
|
Payload
560 - 921 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 130 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 16.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 13.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
130 - 135 km/h
|
Max Speed
135 - 186 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1461 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2022 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.