Compare performance (130 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 21,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Kangoo or Toyota Proace City Compact Van?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Toyota Proace City Compact Van is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,200 £ , while the Renault Kangoo costs 25,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,534 £.
Both cars consume an average of 5.2 L/100km – no difference here.
In terms of energy consumption, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van is marginally more efficient: consuming 18.5 kWh/100km compared to 20.2 kWh/100km for the Renault Kangoo. That’s a difference of about 1.7 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 337 km, about 52 km more than the Renault Kangoo.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van offers barely more power – delivering 136 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 6 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 11.1 s, while the Renault Kangoo takes 11.6 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van is clearly faster – reaching 186 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo tops out at 135 km/h. The difference is around 51 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota Proace City Compact Van delivers only slightly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Renault Kangoo offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota Proace City Compact Van is marginally lighter – 1,358 kg compared to 1,489 kg. The difference is around 131 kg.
For maximum load capacity, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van offers markedly more capacity – up to 4,300 L, about 1,250 L more than the Renault Kangoo.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van carries markedly more – 921 kg compared to 610 kg. That’s a difference of about 311 kg.
The Toyota Proace City Compact Van is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Kangoo is the pragmatic chameleon of small vans, marrying van-like practicality with carlike comfort and a cheerful, friendly face that suits both family runs and workday hauls. It's sensible, versatile and annoyingly useful — easy to live with, cheap to run and clever where it counts, so you get more space and fewer compromises than the price suggests.
detailsThe Toyota Proace City Compact Van is a city-savvy workhorse that packs surprising practicality and smart packaging into a friendly, easy-to-drive package. It’s the kind of van that gets the job done without fuss — reliable, economical and just sensible enough to make fleet managers smile.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,700 - 36,200 £
|
Price
21,200 - 37,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.2 - 21.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
278 - 285 km
|
Electric Range
337 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 168 g/km
|
co2
0 - 150 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 61 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1,489 - 2,041 kg
|
Curb weight
1,358 - 1,837 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 950 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,486 - 4,911 mm
|
Length
4,401 - 4,751 mm
|
|
Width
1,860 - 1,919 mm
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
|
Height
1,838 - 1,869 mm
|
Height
1,860 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,500 - 3,050 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3,300 - 4,300 L
|
|
Payload
459 - 610 kg
|
Payload
560 - 921 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 130 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 16.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 13.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
130 - 135 km/h
|
Max Speed
135 - 186 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Toyota
|