VS

Renault Master Transporter vs Nissan Micra comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (38,600 £ vs 24,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Master Transporter or Nissan Micra?

Renault Master Transporter vs Nissan Micra: Key differences

Renault Master Transporter

  • a bit more power
  • marginally more electric range
details

Nissan Micra

4.2 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Master Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Nissan Micra is considerably cheaper – starting at 24,000 £ , while the Renault Master Transporter costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,656 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Nissan Micra is clearly more efficient: consuming 14.2 kWh/100km compared to 22.6 kWh/100km for the Renault Master Transporter. That’s a difference of about 8.4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Renault Master Transporter offers marginally more range – reaching up to 448 km, about 32 km more than the Nissan Micra.

Micra

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Master Transporter offers a bit more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 20 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Micra is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Renault Master Transporter takes 13.5 s. That’s about 5.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Master Transporter delivers noticeably more torque with 380 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 135 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Nissan Micra offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Micra is clearly lighter – 1,452 kg compared to 2,128 kg. The difference is around 676 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Master Transporter carries considerably more – 1,846 kg compared to 408 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,438 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Micra is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,000
Micra

Nissan Micra

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 122 - 150 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.2 - 14.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 317 - 416 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Dolphin Surf
Nissan Micra
VS
BYD Dolphin Surf vs Nissan Micra — two small hatchbacks aimed at city buyers, but with very different approaches: the Dolphin Surf is an all-electric, tech-focused city car while the Micra is a traditional, cheap-to-buy petrol supermini. Below I’ll break down the practical differences and tell you …
Ford Puma
Nissan Micra
VS
The Ford Puma and Nissan Micra both aim at city-minded drivers but take different paths: the Puma is a compact crossover that prioritises space, ride comfort and practicality, while the Micra is a small hatchback built around affordability, simplicity and easy urban manoeuvring. Choose the Puma if …
Renault Master Transporter
Nissan Micra

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Master Transporter

The Renault Master is a pragmatic workhorse that swallows cargo with an unbothered grin, offering clever practicality and load-friendly packaging for tradespeople and fleet buyers. It won’t excite like a sports car, but it steers predictably, runs economically and gets the job done day after day — like a reliable colleague who never calls in sick.

details
serpimg_2EkqG5

Reviews Renault Master Transporter

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Nissan Micra

The Nissan Micra is a compact hatchback renowned for its agile handling and city-friendly dimensions. With a design that blends sleek curves with a practical layout, it appeals to urban drivers who value style and efficiency. Inside, the car offers a surprising amount of room and useful tech features, making it both a convenient and comfortable ride for daily commutes.

details
serpimg_LJ8L9f

Reviews Nissan Micra

4.2 (2 Reviews)
rate
Franz
29 Jul 2026, 13:54:54

The Nissan drives quietly and feels very grown-up. The fit and finish are good, too. It offers very fair value for money. However, the rear space is rather unsuitable for tall people.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Interstar
Renault Master Transporter
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Interstar and the Renault Master comes down to balancing payload, practicality and running costs for light commercial use. This comparison will cover cargo capacity, engines, fuel economy, driving comfort and ownership costs so you can pick the van that best fits your …
Nissan Micra
Skoda Epiq
VS
Unsure whether the Nissan Micra or the Skoda Epiq is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Hyundai Inster
Nissan Micra
VS
The Hyundai Inster hustles through town with roomy practicality and wallet-friendly running costs, while the Nissan Micra scores points for sharper handling, cheeky styling and a more engaging turbo feel. For no-nonsense commuting pick the Inster; if you crave personality and a bit of fun behind …
Opel Vivaro
Renault Master Transporter
VS
Opel Vivaro and Renault Master Transporter go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Nissan Leaf
Nissan Micra
VS
Nissan Leaf and Nissan Micra go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Fiat 600
Nissan Micra
VS
Deciding between the Fiat 600 and the Nissan Micra means choosing between Italian flair and simple, city-friendly packaging versus the Micra’s modern practicality and refinement. This comparison examines size, performance, economy, comfort and running costs so you can pick the small car that fits …
Fiat Ducato
Renault Master Transporter
VS
In the world of versatile transport vans, the Fiat Ducato and the Renault Master both offer impressive utility, yet they cater to slightly different needs. The Ducato stands out with its robust engine options and efficient fuel economy, making it ideal for long-haul delivery businesses. On the …
Nissan Micra
VW ID.Polo
VS
Unsure whether the Nissan Micra or the VW ID.Polo is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Renault Master Transporter
Nissan Micra

Costs and Consumption
Price
38,600 - 54,600 £
Price
24,000 - 29,900 £
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 12.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
22.6 - 25.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.2 - 14.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
177 - 448 km
Electric Range
317 - 416 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 318 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
3
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,128 - 2,598 kg
Curb weight
1,452 - 1,527 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,080 mm
Width
1,774 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
902 - 1,846 kg
Payload
403 - 408 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Torque
225 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Renault
Brand
Nissan
What drive types are available for the Renault Master Transporter?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.