VS

Renault Trafic Transporter vs KGM Musso EV comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 414 HP), boot space and price (38,100 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Trafic Transporter or KGM Musso EV?

Renault Trafic Transporter vs KGM Musso EV: Key differences

Renault Trafic Transporter

  • very slightly more efficient
  • slightly lighter
details

KGM Musso EV

  • only slightly cheaper
  • significantly more power
  • markedly more electric range
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Trafic Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

KGM Musso EV is only slightly cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the Renault Trafic Transporter costs 38,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,106 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Renault Trafic Transporter is very slightly more efficient: consuming 21.2 kWh/100km compared to 23 kWh/100km for the KGM Musso EV. That’s a difference of about 1.8 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the KGM Musso EV offers markedly more range – reaching up to 420 km, about 102 km more than the Renault Trafic Transporter.

Musso EV

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the KGM Musso EV offers significantly more power – delivering 414 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 244 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the KGM Musso EV is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Renault Trafic Transporter takes 10.8 s. That’s about 2.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the KGM Musso EV delivers significantly more torque with 678 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 298 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Renault Trafic Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Trafic Transporter is slightly lighter – 1,848 kg compared to 2,165 kg. The difference is around 317 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Trafic Transporter carries visibly more – 1,222 kg compared to 905 kg. That’s a difference of about 317 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The KGM Musso EV is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
Musso EV

KGM Musso EV

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 207 - 414 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 23 - 26 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 379 - 420 km
Renault Trafic Transporter
KGM Musso EV

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Renault Trafic Transporter

The Renault Trafic is a practical, workhorse transporter that hides thoughtful cabin comfort behind a tough, utilitarian exterior, so you can tackle a busy week without sacrificing sanity. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want reliability and clever flexibility rather than flash, with just enough character to make daily hauling feel less like a chore.

details

KGM Musso EV

The Musso EV blends pickup practicality with an electric drivetrain, delivering quiet performance and a roomy, well-equipped cabin that suits both work and everyday use. Its robust design and straightforward controls make it a compelling choice for buyers who want a capable utility vehicle with cleaner operation.

details
Renault Trafic Transporter
KGM Musso EV

Costs and Consumption

Price
38,100 - 43,500 £
Price
36,000 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 22.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
23 - 26 kWh/100km
Electric Range
240 - 318 km
Electric Range
379 - 420 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 184 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
Pickup
Seats
3 - 6
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,848 - 2,075 kg
Curb weight
2,165 - 2,285 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,956 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
899 - 1,222 kg
Payload
805 - 905 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 - 170 HP
Power HP
207 - 414 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 - 13.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
245 - 380 Nm
Torque
339 - 678 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
90 - 125 kW
Power kW
152 - 304 kW
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Renault
Brand
KGM
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.