Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Enyaq vs BYD Atto 2 comparison
Compare performance (340 HP vs 212 HP), boot space and price (41,900 £ vs 27,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or BYD Atto 2?
Skoda Enyaq vs BYD Atto 2: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Video - Skoda Enyaq
Enyaq
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
BYD Atto 2 is substantially cheaper – starting at 27,400 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,494 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is marginally more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 15.8 kWh/100km for the BYD Atto 2. That’s a difference of about 1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers visibly more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 157 km more than the BYD Atto 2.
Atto 2
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers markedly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 212 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the BYD Atto 2 takes 7.5 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 310 Nm. That’s about 369 Nm more.
Enyaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BYD Atto 2 is substantially lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 669 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers markedly more boot space – 585 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 135 L.
When it comes to payload, the BYD Atto 2 carries very slightly more – 490 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £41,900
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Atto 2
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
BYD Atto 2
The Atto 2 is making waves in the electric vehicle market with its sleek design and impressive range. This innovative model combines cutting-edge technology with captivating aesthetics, making it a standout choice for eco-conscious drivers. With its spacious interior and advanced features, the Atto 2 offers both comfort and convenience for everyday use.
details
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Atto 2
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
|
Price
27,400 - 36,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
Electric Range
40 - 430 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 41 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
|
Curb weight
1,510 - 1,720 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
400 - 450 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
Width
1,830 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Payload
260 - 490 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
166 - 212 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.5 - 9.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 310 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
122 - 156 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
BYD
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.