VS

Skoda Enyaq vs BYD Atto 2 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 212 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 30,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or BYD Atto 2?

Skoda Enyaq vs BYD Atto 2: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • visibly more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

BYD Atto 2

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

BYD Atto 2 is a bit cheaper – starting at 30,800 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,000 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is marginally more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 15.8 kWh/100km for the BYD Atto 2. That’s a difference of about 0.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers visibly more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 159 km more than the BYD Atto 2.

Atto 2

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers markedly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 212 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the BYD Atto 2 takes 7.5 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 310 Nm. That’s about 369 Nm more.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, BYD Atto 2 is noticeably lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 564 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers markedly more boot space – 585 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 135 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries very slightly more – 526 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 36 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
BYD Dolphin
BYD Atto 2
VS
The BYD Dolphin and BYD Atto 2 represent two distinct EV choices from BYD: the Dolphin is a compact, city-oriented hatchback focused on efficiency and nimble urban driving, while the Atto 2 is a compact crossover offering more space, a higher driving position and richer tech. Choose the Dolphin for …
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Atto 2

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
04_new_skoda_enyaq_68cf74d6-1920x1280
11_new_skoda_enyaq_c2b962a0-1920x1280
12_new_skoda_enyaq_de0afe4c-1920x1280
33_new_skoda_enyaq_833cbb5e-1920x1440
48_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_dad4ad75-1920x1280
49_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_37c35e34-1920x1280
50_new_skoda_enyaq_coupe_f55ae8bb-1920x1858

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

BYD Atto 2

The BYD Atto 2 is a stylish compact electric SUV that blends bold exterior design with a roomy, tech-focused interior, making it well suited to daily driving and urban life. It delivers a comfortable ride and practical features that will appeal to buyers looking for a modern, user-friendly EV.

details
atto2 Kopie
byd-atto2-interior-01-m

Reviews BYD Atto 2

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
Carlos Aguilar
5 Feb 2026, 13:15:18

I've done 6,000 km and I'm delighted. I haven't tried other EVs, but I'm thrilled with the BYD Atto 2. It's true I don't go on long trips — I do everything in the city and nearby, about 100 to 150 km a day — and honestly it's been great in every way. When I hit 300,000 km I'll tell you again. Haha

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

BYD Atto 2
GWM ORA 05
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 2 and the GWM ORA 05 helps you choose between two compact electric crossovers that blend bold styling, modern tech and city-friendly practicality. I'll highlight where each excels — range, interior comfort, driving feel and overall value — so you can pick the one that best …
BYD Atto 2
MG MG4 Urban
VS
The BYD Atto 2 and the MG4 Urban are two popular compact EVs offering distinctive approaches to styling, range and value. This comparison will help you decide whether the Atto 2’s roomy, comfort-focused cabin and clever tech or the MG4 Urban’s sharper driving dynamics and hatchback practicality …
Omoda 5
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Omoda 5 and BYD Atto 2 are eye-catching compact crossovers that compete on modern styling, tech-packed cabins and strong value for money. This quick comparison will show how they differ in space, equipment, driving character and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
BYD Atto 2
Kia EV2
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 2 and the Kia EV2 pits BYD’s quirky, tech-heavy compact crossover against Kia’s pragmatic, value-focused electric newcomer. Both aim at affordable electric mobility but differ in styling, interior character, driving feel and feature priorities — so your decision will hinge on …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.7 share the VW Group’s MEB electric platform, but they’re aimed at different buyers. The Enyaq is a practical, family-focused SUV that emphasizes interior space, usability and value, while the ID.7 is a sleek, aerodynamic saloon tuned for long-range efficiency and …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
Comparing the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.7 Touring pits a practical, roomy electric SUV against a sleek, long-distance electric estate. Both share VW Group underpinnings, but the Enyaq prioritizes interior space and value while the ID.7 Touring focuses on aerodynamic efficiency, range and …
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Atto 2

Costs and Consumption
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Price
30,800 - 36,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 17.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Electric Range
40 - 430 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 72 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Curb weight
1,510 - 1,720 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
425 - 450 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,830 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
449 - 526 kg
Payload
420 - 490 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
166 - 212 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.5 - 9.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
310 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
122 - 156 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
BYD
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Enyaq have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.