VS

Skoda Enyaq vs XPeng G9 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 575 HP), boot space and price (41,900 £ vs 51,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or XPeng G9?

Skoda Enyaq vs XPeng G9: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • visibly more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • barely lighter
details

XPeng G9

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Enyaq

Introduction: Head to Head in the EV Arena

The electric vehicle market is rapidly evolving, and two prominent contenders that have caught the eye of automotive enthusiasts are the Skoda Enyaq and the XPeng G9. Both vehicles represent the prowess of their respective brands, showcasing innovative technologies and impressive performance metrics. This comparison will delve into their technical aspects and innovations, helping potential buyers make an informed decision.

G9

Design and Dimensions

When it comes to body style, both the Skoda Enyaq and the XPeng G9 are classified as SUVs, providing ample space for passengers and cargo. The Enyaq measures 4649 mm in length, 1879 mm in width, and stands 1621 mm tall, making it a robust vehicle that is practical for daily use. In contrast, the G9 is longer at 4891 mm, broader at 1937 mm, and slightly taller at 1680 mm, which may appeal to buyers looking for a larger footprint.

Enyaq

Power and Performance

The Skoda Enyaq is available with two power outputs: 210 kW (286 HP) for the rear-wheel drive variant and 250 kW (340 HP) for the all-wheel drive model. It boasts impressive torque figures of 545 Nm and 679 Nm, respectively. Acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h can be achieved in as little as 5.5 seconds.

On the other hand, the XPeng G9 offers a more powerful driving experience, with outputs reaching up to 405 kW (551 HP) and a remarkable torque of 717 Nm. This powerful SUV can sprint from 0 to 100 km/h in a mere 3.9 seconds, positioning it as a performance-oriented option in the electric vehicle sector.

G9

Range and Efficiency

In terms of electric range, the Skoda Enyaq has a competitive advantage, boasting ranges between 525 km to 573 km depending on the specific model and battery capacity of 77 kWh. Coupled with an impressive consumption rate of around 14.6 to 16.4 kWh/100km, the Enyaq emerges as a highly efficient contender.

However, the XPeng G9 offers a decent range between 460 km and 570 km with a battery capacity of either 75.8 kWh or 93.1 kWh, but its consumption figures are less favorable, ranging from 19.4 to 21.3 kWh/100 km. While the G9 includes a larger battery option for extended range, potential buyers may find the Enyaq more appealing for longer trips.

Enyaq

Innovative Features and Technology

Both vehicles are equipped with the latest technology aimed at enhancing the driving experience. The Skoda Enyaq features a user-friendly infotainment system and an array of advanced driver-assistance systems, ensuring a comfortable and safe ride. Its interior is spacious and offers a trunk capacity of 585 to 570 liters, making it practical for family use.

The XPeng G9, meanwhile, boasts cutting-edge innovations like an advanced autonomous driving system and an elaborate infotainment setup that includes voice recognition technology. An incredible trunk capacity of 660 liters makes it highly versatile for storage needs, ideal for weekend getaways or daily commutes.

G9

Final Thoughts

Both the Skoda Enyaq and the XPeng G9 bring significant strengths to the electric vehicle market. The Enyaq stands out for its efficiency, spacious interior, and practicality, making it an excellent choice for families and daily drivers. In contrast, the G9 captivates performance enthusiasts with its exhilarating acceleration and tech-savvy features, appealing to those who prioritize innovation and power.

Ultimately, choosing between these two electric SUVs depends on what you value more—efficiency and space or performance and cutting-edge technology. The future of electric vehicles is bright, and both Skoda and XPeng are leading the charge.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail
▶

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Skoda Enyaq vs Skoda Elroq: the seasoned EV family hauler squares up to the fresh-faced compact crossover in a duel for your driveway. Same sensible Czech DNA, but which one nails the sweet spot of space, range, and value without draining your budget—or your patience?
XPeng G6
XPeng G9
VS
The XPeng G6 is the nimble, value-packed option — a compact EV that squeezes impressive range and smart tech into a friendly price, ideal for buyers who want clever daily driving without flagship sticker shock. The XPeng G9, by contrast, is the full-size flagship: more power, longer range and a …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Enyaq is clearly cheaper – starting at 41,900 £ , while the XPeng G9 costs 51,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,171 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is visibly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 18.4 kWh/100km for the XPeng G9. That’s a difference of about 3.6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 2 km more than the XPeng G9.

G9

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the XPeng G9 offers significantly more power – delivering 575 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 235 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng G9 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the XPeng G9 delivers very slightly more torque with 695 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 16 Nm more.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is barely lighter – 2,179 kg compared to 2,210 kg. The difference is around 31 kg.

Looking at boot space, the XPeng G9 offers slightly more boot space – 660 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 75 L.

When it comes to payload, the XPeng G9 carries marginally more – 520 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 31 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The XPeng G9 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £51,100
G9

XPeng G9

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 351 - 575 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.4 - 20.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 502 - 585 km
details
Skoda Enyaq
XPeng G9

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a reassuring, family‑first electric SUV that trades sporting drama for exceptional quiet, roomy rear seats and a genuinely practical boot. It’s remarkably easy to live with thanks to sensible controls and steady fast charging, though the touchscreen‑led infotainment can be sluggish and driving enthusiasts looking for sharp handling should look elsewhere.

details
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117406
SKODA_ENYAQ_COUPÃ_iV_118256
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117395
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117410
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117400

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

XPeng G9

The XPeng G9 feels like a confident leap into the electric SUV world, with sleek, purposeful styling and an interior that mixes modern tech with everyday comfort. On the road it’s calm and composed, serving up effortless pace and hushed refinement that turns long commutes into something you might actually enjoy — a strong pick for buyers who want electric convenience without compromise.

details
IMG_0235
IMG_0234
IMG_0233

Reviews XPeng G9

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Rob
1 Jan 2026, 18:43:08

I've seen and driven both cars. The XPeng 9 makes more of an impression. The Zeekr 7x's interior color is limited to black — a real shame! For a nicer contrast you'll have to have it wrapped in a different color. But that's a matter of taste! Otherwise the cars are comparable, noting that the XPeng is a proper SUV while the Zeekr 7x is a crossover.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
The Skoda Enyaq plays the sensible family EV: calm, roomy and beautifully screwed together, while the Kia EV5 turns up with concept-car swagger, smart storage and value that’ll have accountants smiling. If you want long-haul refinement and a cavernous boot, pick the Enyaq; if bold design, generous …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
XPeng G9
ZEEKR 7X
VS
XPeng G9 arrives as a tech‑forward grand tourer — slick, serene and stuffed with autonomous driving toys and a luxurious, quietly sophisticated cabin; the ZEEKR 7X, by contrast, plays the sportier, more pragmatic card, delivering sharper handling, a brasher road presence and strong value for buyers …
CUPRA Tavascan
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Between the showy CUPRA Tavascan and the sensible Skoda Enyaq you get adrenaline and design versus roominess and value — the Tavascan is a sporty, design-led EV that prioritises engagement, while the Enyaq is a spacious, pragmatic family SUV with sensible range and a friendlier price of entry. Pick …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
The Škoda Enyaq is the roomy, no-nonsense EV SUV that puts practicality and bang‑for‑buck front and centre, while the VW ID.7 Touring is a sleek, aerodynamic estate that prioritises range and motorway comfort — sensible family hauler versus long‑distance specialist. Buy the Enyaq for space, …
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Skoda Enyaq is the sensible, family-friendly EV — roomy, comfortably composed and refreshingly free of gimmicks, the sort of car that quietly makes everyday life easier. BYD Sealion 7, by contrast, trades conservatism for style and tech, offering punchy electric performance and impressive value …
BYD Tang
XPeng G9
VS
The BYD Tang and XPeng G9 are two compelling contenders in the growing electric SUV market, each offering unique features and striking designs. The Tang impresses with its spacious interior and robust battery range, making it a practical choice for families on the go. Meanwhile, the G9 stands out …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
The Ford Explorer EV and Skoda Enyaq present a compelling match-up in the growing electric SUV market, each offering an impressive blend of performance and versatility. While the Explorer EV boasts a spacious interior and a robust powertrain, the Enyaq stands out with its strong emphasis on …
Skoda Enyaq
XPeng G9

Costs and Consumption
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
Price
51,100 - 62,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.4 - 20.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Electric Range
502 - 585 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
Curb weight
2,210 - 2,395 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
660 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,937 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
443 - 489 kg
Payload
515 - 520 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Power HP
351 - 575 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Torque
465 - 695 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Power kW
258 - 423 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
XPeng
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Enyaq have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.