Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Enyaq vs XPeng G9 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (340 HP vs 575 HP), boot space and price (38100 £ vs 51100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or XPeng G9?
Enyaq
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Enyaq has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38100 £ , while the XPeng G9 costs 51100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13028 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s clearly perceptible more efficient than the XPeng G9 with 18.40 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.60 kWh.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 587 km, about 2 km more than the XPeng G9.
G9
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the XPeng G9 has a clearly edge – offering 575 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 235 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng G9 is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 4.20 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 1.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the XPeng G9 performs barely noticeable better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: XPeng G9 pulls slight stronger with 695 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 16 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Enyaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is to a small extent lighter – 2002 kg compared to 2210 kg. The difference is around 208 kg.
In terms of boot space, the XPeng G9 offers somewhat more room – 660 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 75 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs minimal better – up to 1710 L, which is about 134 L more than the XPeng G9.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The XPeng G9 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Skoda Enyaq
XPeng G9
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £51,100
XPeng G9
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
XPeng G9
4.6 (3 Reviews)
The XPeng G9 feels like a confident leap into the electric SUV world, with sleek, purposeful styling and an interior that mixes modern tech with everyday comfort. On the road it’s calm and composed, serving up effortless pace and hushed refinement that turns long commutes into something you might actually enjoy — a strong pick for buyers who want electric convenience without compromise.
details
Skoda Enyaq
XPeng G9
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
Price
51100 - 62200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.4 - 20.1 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
Electric Range
502 - 585 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
78.2 - 92.2 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
Curb weight
2210 - 2395 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
660 L
|
|
Length
4658 mm
|
Length
4891 mm
|
|
Width
1879 mm
|
Width
1937 mm
|
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
Height
1670 - 1680 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1576 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
351 - 575 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
465 - 695 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
258 - 423 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
XPeng
|
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?
The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.