VS

Skoda Enyaq vs XPeng G9 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 575 HP), boot space and price (41900 £ vs 51100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or XPeng G9?

Enyaq

Introduction: Head to Head in the EV Arena

The electric vehicle market is rapidly evolving, and two prominent contenders that have caught the eye of automotive enthusiasts are the Skoda Enyaq and the XPeng G9. Both vehicles represent the prowess of their respective brands, showcasing innovative technologies and impressive performance metrics. This comparison will delve into their technical aspects and innovations, helping potential buyers make an informed decision.

G9

Design and Dimensions

When it comes to body style, both the Skoda Enyaq and the XPeng G9 are classified as SUVs, providing ample space for passengers and cargo. The Enyaq measures 4649 mm in length, 1879 mm in width, and stands 1621 mm tall, making it a robust vehicle that is practical for daily use. In contrast, the G9 is longer at 4891 mm, broader at 1937 mm, and slightly taller at 1680 mm, which may appeal to buyers looking for a larger footprint.

Enyaq

Power and Performance

The Skoda Enyaq is available with two power outputs: 210 kW (286 HP) for the rear-wheel drive variant and 250 kW (340 HP) for the all-wheel drive model. It boasts impressive torque figures of 545 Nm and 679 Nm, respectively. Acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h can be achieved in as little as 5.5 seconds.

On the other hand, the XPeng G9 offers a more powerful driving experience, with outputs reaching up to 405 kW (551 HP) and a remarkable torque of 717 Nm. This powerful SUV can sprint from 0 to 100 km/h in a mere 3.9 seconds, positioning it as a performance-oriented option in the electric vehicle sector.

G9

Range and Efficiency

In terms of electric range, the Skoda Enyaq has a competitive advantage, boasting ranges between 525 km to 573 km depending on the specific model and battery capacity of 77 kWh. Coupled with an impressive consumption rate of around 14.6 to 16.4 kWh/100km, the Enyaq emerges as a highly efficient contender.

However, the XPeng G9 offers a decent range between 460 km and 570 km with a battery capacity of either 75.8 kWh or 93.1 kWh, but its consumption figures are less favorable, ranging from 19.4 to 21.3 kWh/100 km. While the G9 includes a larger battery option for extended range, potential buyers may find the Enyaq more appealing for longer trips.

Enyaq

Innovative Features and Technology

Both vehicles are equipped with the latest technology aimed at enhancing the driving experience. The Skoda Enyaq features a user-friendly infotainment system and an array of advanced driver-assistance systems, ensuring a comfortable and safe ride. Its interior is spacious and offers a trunk capacity of 585 to 570 liters, making it practical for family use.

The XPeng G9, meanwhile, boasts cutting-edge innovations like an advanced autonomous driving system and an elaborate infotainment setup that includes voice recognition technology. An incredible trunk capacity of 660 liters makes it highly versatile for storage needs, ideal for weekend getaways or daily commutes.

G9

Final Thoughts

Both the Skoda Enyaq and the XPeng G9 bring significant strengths to the electric vehicle market. The Enyaq stands out for its efficiency, spacious interior, and practicality, making it an excellent choice for families and daily drivers. In contrast, the G9 captivates performance enthusiasts with its exhilarating acceleration and tech-savvy features, appealing to those who prioritize innovation and power.

Ultimately, choosing between these two electric SUVs depends on what you value more—efficiency and space or performance and cutting-edge technology. The future of electric vehicles is bright, and both Skoda and XPeng are leading the charge.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq vs XPeng G9: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • evident cheaper
  • clearly perceptible more efficient
  • barely noticeable more electric range
  • minimal lighter

XPeng G9

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • distinct quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Enyaq has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £ , while the XPeng G9 costs 51100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9171 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s clearly perceptible more efficient than the XPeng G9 with 18.40 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.60 kWh.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 587 km, about 2 km more than the XPeng G9.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the XPeng G9 has a clearly edge – offering 575 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 235 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng G9 is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 4.20 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 1.20 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: XPeng G9 pulls slight stronger with 695 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 16 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is minimal lighter – 2179 kg compared to 2210 kg. The difference is around 31 kg.

In terms of boot space, the XPeng G9 offers somewhat more room – 660 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 75 L.

When it comes to payload, XPeng G9 barely noticeable takes the win – 520 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 31 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The XPeng G9 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Skoda Enyaq
XPeng G9

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £51,100
G9

XPeng G9

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 351 - 575 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.4 - 20.1 kWh
  • Electric Range : 502 - 585 km

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details

XPeng G9

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate

The XPeng G9 feels like a confident leap into the electric SUV world, with sleek, purposeful styling and an interior that mixes modern tech with everyday comfort. On the road it’s calm and composed, serving up effortless pace and hushed refinement that turns long commutes into something you might actually enjoy — a strong pick for buyers who want electric convenience without compromise.

details
Skoda Enyaq
XPeng G9

Costs and Consumption

Price
41900 - 52200 £
Price
51100 - 62200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
18.4 - 20.1 kWh
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Electric Range
502 - 585 km
Battery Capacity
77 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2179 - 2293 kg
Curb weight
2210 - 2395 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
660 L
Length
4658 mm
Length
-
Width
1879 mm
Width
1937 mm
Height
1620 - 1621 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
443 - 489 kg
Payload
515 - 520 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Power HP
351 - 575 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.6 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Torque
465 - 695 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Power kW
258 - 423 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
XPeng
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?

The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.