The Skoda Enyaq and XPeng G9 are two compelling contenders in the electric SUV market, each offering unique features and capabilities. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and robust driving range, making it a practical choice for family outings. Meanwhile, the XPeng G9 stands out with its cutting-edge technology and smart connectivity options, appealing to tech-savvy drivers looking for an innovative experience.
The electric vehicle market is rapidly evolving, and two prominent contenders that have caught the eye of automotive enthusiasts are the Skoda Enyaq and the XPeng G9. Both vehicles represent the prowess of their respective brands, showcasing innovative technologies and impressive performance metrics. This comparison will delve into their technical aspects and innovations, helping potential buyers make an informed decision.
When it comes to body style, both the Skoda Enyaq and the XPeng G9 are classified as SUVs, providing ample space for passengers and cargo. The Enyaq measures 4649 mm in length, 1879 mm in width, and stands 1621 mm tall, making it a robust vehicle that is practical for daily use. In contrast, the G9 is longer at 4891 mm, broader at 1937 mm, and slightly taller at 1680 mm, which may appeal to buyers looking for a larger footprint.
The Skoda Enyaq is available with two power outputs: 210 kW (286 HP) for the rear-wheel drive variant and 250 kW (340 HP) for the all-wheel drive model. It boasts impressive torque figures of 545 Nm and 679 Nm, respectively. Acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h can be achieved in as little as 5.5 seconds.
On the other hand, the XPeng G9 offers a more powerful driving experience, with outputs reaching up to 405 kW (551 HP) and a remarkable torque of 717 Nm. This powerful SUV can sprint from 0 to 100 km/h in a mere 3.9 seconds, positioning it as a performance-oriented option in the electric vehicle sector.
In terms of electric range, the Skoda Enyaq has a competitive advantage, boasting ranges between 525 km to 573 km depending on the specific model and battery capacity of 77 kWh. Coupled with an impressive consumption rate of around 14.6 to 16.4 kWh/100km, the Enyaq emerges as a highly efficient contender.
However, the XPeng G9 offers a decent range between 460 km and 570 km with a battery capacity of either 75.8 kWh or 93.1 kWh, but its consumption figures are less favorable, ranging from 19.4 to 21.3 kWh/100 km. While the G9 includes a larger battery option for extended range, potential buyers may find the Enyaq more appealing for longer trips.
Both vehicles are equipped with the latest technology aimed at enhancing the driving experience. The Skoda Enyaq features a user-friendly infotainment system and an array of advanced driver-assistance systems, ensuring a comfortable and safe ride. Its interior is spacious and offers a trunk capacity of 585 to 570 liters, making it practical for family use.
The XPeng G9, meanwhile, boasts cutting-edge innovations like an advanced autonomous driving system and an elaborate infotainment setup that includes voice recognition technology. An incredible trunk capacity of 660 liters makes it highly versatile for storage needs, ideal for weekend getaways or daily commutes.
Both the Skoda Enyaq and the XPeng G9 bring significant strengths to the electric vehicle market. The Enyaq stands out for its efficiency, spacious interior, and practicality, making it an excellent choice for families and daily drivers. In contrast, the G9 captivates performance enthusiasts with its exhilarating acceleration and tech-savvy features, appealing to those who prioritize innovation and power.
Ultimately, choosing between these two electric SUVs depends on what you value more—efficiency and space or performance and cutting-edge technology. The future of electric vehicles is bright, and both Skoda and XPeng are leading the charge.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 38100 - 54300
£
|
Price
about 51100 - 61400
£
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.4
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.4 - 21.3
kWh
|
Electric Range
428 - 587
km
|
Electric Range
460 - 570
km
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 93.1
kWh
|
co2
0
g/km
|
co2
0
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2258
kg
|
Curb weight
2210 - 2340
kg
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585
L
|
Trunk capacity
660
L
|
Length
4649 - 4658
mm
|
Length
4891
mm
|
Width
1879
mm
|
Width
1937
mm
|
Height
1620 - 1623
mm
|
Height
1670 - 1680
mm
|
Payload
492 - 528
kg
|
Payload
445 - 470
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
204 - 340
HP
|
Power HP
313 - 551
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 8.1
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6.4
s
|
Max Speed
160 - 180
km/h
|
Max Speed
200
km/h
|
Torque
310 - 679
Nm
|
Torque
430 - 717
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Power kW
150 - 250
kW
|
Power kW
230 - 405
kW
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Top speed
160 - 180
km/h
|
Top speed
200
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
XPeng
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.