VS

Skoda Enyaq vs XPeng P7 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 473 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 42,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or XPeng P7?

Skoda Enyaq vs XPeng P7: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • somewhat more efficient
  • barely more electric range
  • markedly more trunk space
details

XPeng P7

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Enyaq is a bit cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the XPeng P7 costs 42,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,666 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is somewhat more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 16.8 kWh/100km for the XPeng P7. That’s a difference of about 1.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers barely more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 13 km more than the XPeng P7.

P7

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the XPeng P7 offers clearly more power – delivering 473 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 133 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng P7 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the XPeng P7 delivers moderately more torque with 757 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 78 Nm more.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, XPeng P7 is barely lighter – 2,020 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 54 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers markedly more boot space – 585 L compared to 440 L. That’s a difference of about 145 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries slightly more – 526 kg compared to 430 kg. That’s a difference of about 96 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The XPeng P7 holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,500
P7

XPeng P7

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 276 - 473 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.8 - 19.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 505 - 576 km
Skoda Enyaq
XPeng P7

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details

XPeng P7

The XPeng P7 cuts a sleek, coupe-like silhouette that looks like a tech firm's idea of a stylish electric sedan, and its minimalist cabin packs smart screens and handy features that actually improve everyday life. Underneath the future-facing image it drives with surprising poise and comes loaded with advanced driver aids, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want electric charisma without the hype.

details
Skoda Enyaq
XPeng P7

Costs and Consumption

Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Price
42,500 - 50,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.8 - 19.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Electric Range
505 - 576 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
82.7 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Curb weight
2,020 - 2,140 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
440 L
Length
-
Length
4,888 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,896 mm
Height
-
Height
1,450 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
449 - 526 kg
Payload
430 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
276 - 473 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
200 km/h
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
440 - 757 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
203 - 348 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
XPeng
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.