Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Enyaq vs XPeng P7 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (340 HP vs 473 HP), boot space and price (38100 £ vs 42500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or XPeng P7?
Enyaq
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Enyaq has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38100 £ , while the XPeng P7 costs 42500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4457 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s slightly more efficient than the XPeng P7 with 16.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2 kWh.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs slight better – achieving up to 587 km, about 11 km more than the XPeng P7.
P7
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the XPeng P7 has a distinct edge – offering 473 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 133 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng P7 is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 4.10 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 1.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the XPeng P7 performs slight better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: XPeng P7 pulls a bit stronger with 757 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 78 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Enyaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is barely noticeable lighter – 2002 kg compared to 2020 kg. The difference is around 18 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers evident more room – 585 L compared to 440 L. That’s a difference of about 145 L.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq somewhat takes the win – 509 kg compared to 430 kg. That’s a difference of about 79 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The XPeng P7 holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Skoda Enyaq
XPeng P7
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £42,500
XPeng P7
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
XPeng P7
4.9 (1 Reviews)
The XPeng P7 cuts a sleek, coupe-like silhouette that looks like a tech firm's idea of a stylish electric sedan, and its minimalist cabin packs smart screens and handy features that actually improve everyday life. Underneath the future-facing image it drives with surprising poise and comes loaded with advanced driver aids, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want electric charisma without the hype.
details
Skoda Enyaq
XPeng P7
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
Price
42500 - 50200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.8 - 19.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
Electric Range
505 - 576 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
82.70 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
Curb weight
2020 - 2140 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
440 L
|
|
Length
4658 mm
|
Length
4888 mm
|
|
Width
1879 mm
|
Width
1896 mm
|
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
Height
1450 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Payload
430 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
276 - 473 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
440 - 757 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
203 - 348 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
XPeng
|
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?
The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.