Compare performance (150 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (22,300 £ vs 38,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kamiq or Audi Q3?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the bustling market of compact SUVs, few vehicles stand out as much as the Audi Q3 and the Skoda Kamiq. Each carries the hallmark of German engineering and offers unique features to captivate prospective buyers. This article dives deep into a face-off between these two models, examining their technical aspects, innovations, and what makes each of them distinct.
The Audi Q3 offers a versatile range of engine types, including both petrol and diesel options, catering to various preferences. With a wider horsepower range from 150 to 245 HP, the Q3 promises dynamic driving experiences, with a top speed reaching up to 233 km/h. It also offers more flexibility with transmission choices, sporting both manual and dual-clutch automatic options, and a choice between front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive for different terrains and driving conditions.
On the other hand, the Skoda Kamiq is exclusively petrol-driven, focusing on simplicity and efficiency. The Kamiq's engine outputs range from 95 to 150 HP, with a maximum speed of 214 km/h. While it offers the same transmission types as the Q3, it commits solely to front-wheel drive, making it a straightforward choice for urban and suburban driving.
With growing awareness of environmental impact, fuel efficiency is crucial. The Kamiq scores well in fuel consumption, achieving 5.4 to 5.7 L/100km. Its CO2 emissions are also modest, ranging between 121 and 130 g/km, aligning with a better CO2 efficiency class of D.
The Audi Q3, despite its powerful engine options, presents a higher fuel consumption ranging from 5.5 to 8.5 L/100km, depending on the model configuration. Its CO2 emissions span from 143 to 193 g/km, categorizing it under efficiency classes E to G. However, the Q3 compensates for this with higher performance metrics.
In terms of design, the Audi Q3 has a more robust presence with a length of 4484 to 4500 mm, a width of 1843 to 1849 mm, and a height of 1567 to 1585 mm. Its larger dimensions translate into more interior space and trunk capacity, offering 530 liters for cargo.
The Skoda Kamiq, with its compact form factor of 4241 mm length, 1793 mm width, and 1562 mm height, is designed for city convenience while still providing a substantial trunk capacity of 400 liters. The compact size aids in maneuverability and parking ease, especially in crowded urban settings.
Both SUVs offer seating for five, blending utility with comfort. The Audi Q3's slightly larger interior dimensions afford it an edge in legroom and space comfort for all passengers. Meanwhile, the Kamiq’s interior design is known for its practicality and clever use of space, accommodating passengers comfortably despite the vehicle's smaller stature.
Choosing between the Audi Q3 and the Skoda Kamiq ultimately comes down to priorities. The Audi Q3 appeals to those who value performance, luxury, and a broad engine selection. Its higher power output and optional all-wheel-drive system are tailored for those who enjoy a dynamic driving experience.
The Skoda Kamiq is the perfect match for drivers seeking efficiency, simplicity, and practicality. Its compact size and superior fuel economy make it an ideal companion for urban environments and daily commutes.
Both vehicles boast the reliability and quality expected from their respective brands, making them excellent contenders in the compact SUV segment. The decision rests on whether one's preference leans towards sheer power and luxury or efficient, no-nonsense practicality.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Kamiq is considerably cheaper – starting at 22,300 £ , while the Audi Q3 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,960 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 3.6 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 offers clearly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Skoda Kamiq takes 8.1 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q3 delivers clearly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is clearly lighter – 1,231 kg compared to 1,635 kg. The difference is around 404 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi Q3 offers a bit more boot space – 488 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 88 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kamiq carries barely more – 539 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.
The Audi Q3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Skoda Kamiq is a practical, well-built small crossover that mixes city-friendly manners with surprisingly versatile interior space and clever storage solutions. It offers a comfortable ride, user-friendly technology and solid value, making it a sensible choice for everyday driving.
details
The Audi Q3 is a compact premium crossover that blends sharp styling with a well-crafted interior, making it an appealing choice for urban drivers who want a touch of luxury. It delivers a composed ride, intuitive tech features and a practical cabin, so it works well as a comfortable daily driver with an upscale feel.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
|
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
co2
39 - 195 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
|
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,793 mm
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Payload
505 - 535 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B, F
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Audi
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España