VS

Skoda Kamiq vs Suzuki Swift comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 82 HP), boot space and price (22,300 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kamiq or Suzuki Swift?

Skoda Kamiq vs Suzuki Swift: Key differences

Skoda Kamiq

5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
details

Suzuki Swift

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • noticeably more efficient
  • moderately lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kamiq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Suzuki Swift is markedly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Skoda Kamiq costs 22,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,126 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Swift uses 4.4 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

Swift

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kamiq offers considerably more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kamiq delivers clearly more torque with 250 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 138 Nm more.

Kamiq

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swift is moderately lighter – 1,069 kg compared to 1,231 kg. The difference is around 162 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kamiq carries substantially more – 539 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 243 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kamiq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,300
Kamiq

Skoda Kamiq

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you prioritise everyday practicality and value or a bolder, slightly sportier compact SUV. Both share similar underpinnings, but the Kamiq excels in interior space and efficiency while the T‑Roc offers sharper styling and a …
Suzuki Swift
Toyota Aygo
VS
If you want a pocket rocket that’s actually practical, the Suzuki Swift mixes sprightly handling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and sensible running costs — ideal for buyers who want fun without sacrificing everyday usability. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, is the cheeky city specialist: cheaper to buy, …
Skoda Kamiq
Suzuki Swift

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Kamiq

The Skoda Kamiq is a practical, well-built small crossover that mixes city-friendly manners with surprisingly versatile interior space and clever storage solutions. It offers a comfortable ride, user-friendly technology and solid value, making it a sensible choice for everyday driving.

details
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114819
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114822
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ _114865
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ – Kofferraum_114870
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ Interieur_114688

Reviews Skoda Kamiq

5 (5 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Suzuki Swift

The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.

details
SUZUKI-519
SUZUKI SWIFT-678
SUZUKI SWIFT-954
SUZUKI-058
SUZUKI SWIFT-672
Swift_3

Reviews Suzuki Swift

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
Kris
9 Apr 2026, 18:26:38

Superb quality, fun to drive, and every bit of well layed out kit you'll ever need.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW Taigo
VS
Deciding between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW Taigo? Both are compact crossovers aimed at urban buyers, but the Kamiq emphasizes practicality, interior space and value while the Taigo favors sporty styling and a slightly sharper driving feel—this comparison will help you choose which suits your needs.
SEAT Arona
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Picking between the SEAT Arona and the Skoda Kamiq is largely a choice between a sportier, style-led crossover and a more practical, spacious, value-focused one. Both share similar underpinnings and efficient engines, but the Arona leans toward engaging looks and driving feel while the Kamiq …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Fabia and Skoda Kamiq comes down to whether you prefer a practical, efficient supermini or a taller, more versatile compact crossover. The Fabia excels for city driving and low running costs, while the Kamiq offers extra interior space, a higher driving position and …
Skoda Kamiq
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Small crossover showdown: the Skoda Kamiq and Toyota Yaris Cross both promise compact-SUV practicality, but they take very different routes — the Kamiq leans on clever space, solid build and punchy petrols, while the Yaris Cross trades on hybrid frugality and nimble city manners. We’ll compare …
Kia Picanto
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Kia Picanto and Suzuki Swift are two popular small hatchbacks that balance low running costs with practical, city-friendly dimensions. This comparison focuses on real-world usability, ownership costs and driving experience to help you pick the right one.
Suzuki Ignis
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Ignis and the Swift boils down to whether you want a feisty, high-riding city crossover with extra practicality or a more composed, sportier hatch with sharper handling. The Ignis stands out for its compact SUV character and clever packaging, while the Swift delivers a peppier …
Honda Jazz
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Honda Jazz and the Suzuki Swift comes down to whether you prioritise interior space and everyday practicality or a punchy, fun-to-drive hatchback with lower running costs. The Jazz is prized for its flexible cabin and comfortable urban manners, while the Swift offers sharper …
Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Scala
VS
The Skoda Kamiq is a city‑friendly crossover that trades a bit of sportiness for higher seating, clever storage tricks and SUV looks — great if you want practical versatility and a confident view of the road. The Skoda Scala, meanwhile, is the sharper, more car‑like hatchback with better driving …
Skoda Kamiq
Suzuki Swift

Costs and Consumption
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
Price
17,100 - 21,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
121 - 128 g/km
co2
98 - 110 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
Curb weight
1,069 - 1,145 kg
Trunk capacity
400 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,793 mm
Width
1,735 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
439 - 539 kg
Payload
282 - 296 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Power HP
82 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Torque
112 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Power kW
61 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,197 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Suzuki
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Kamiq have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.