Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Kamiq vs Volvo XC60 comparison
Compare performance (150 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (22,300 £ vs 49,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kamiq or Volvo XC60?
Kamiq
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Kamiq is considerably cheaper – starting at 22,300 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,923 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 2.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.
XC60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers significantly more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 305 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Skoda Kamiq takes 8.1 s. That’s about 3.2 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Skoda Kamiq is moderately faster – reaching 216 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 36 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers significantly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 459 Nm more.
Kamiq
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is considerably lighter – 1,231 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 669 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers moderately more boot space – 483 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 83 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC60 offers only slightly more capacity – up to 1,543 L, about 148 L more than the Skoda Kamiq.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries very slightly more – 550 kg compared to 539 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo XC60 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £49,200
Volvo XC60
Skoda Kamiq
Volvo XC60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Kamiq
The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.
details
Volvo XC60
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.
details
Skoda Kamiq
Volvo XC60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
|
Price
49,200 - 75,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
co2
64 - 169 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
|
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
|
|
Length
4,241 mm
|
Length
4,708 mm
|
|
Width
1,793 mm
|
Width
1,902 mm
|
|
Height
1,562 mm
|
Height
1,655 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,395 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,543 L
|
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Payload
510 - 550 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.