Compare performance (190 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 42,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Karoq or CUPRA Terramar?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the competitive automotive landscape, the struggle between sporty performance and practicality often leads consumers to make tough choices. This time, we delve into a battle between two prominent SUVs: the CUPRA Terramar and the Skoda Karoq. Both vehicles offer unique blends of technology, performance, and comfort, but which one stands out in the 2024 model year? Let's break it down.
The CUPRA Terramar is available with an impressive lineup of engines, including options for Plug-In Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, and traditional petrol engines. The power figures range from 150 HP to a hefty 272 HP, ensuring it can cater to various driving styles. The Terramar excels in acceleration, with the fastest variant achieving 0-100 km/h in just 5.3 seconds. Furthermore, its torque capably supports powerful driving, with up to 400 Nm on offer.
On the other hand, the Skoda Karoq, while slightly less sporty, provides a versatile range of engine options. With power outputs from 115 to a commendable 190 HP, it focuses more on fuel efficiency than outright speed. The quickest Karoq do the 0-100 km/h sprint in 7 seconds but generally sits between 8.7 to 10.6 seconds depending on the configuration. Its torque peaks at 360 Nm, indicating sufficient power for daily driving needs.
With increasing focus on sustainability, the CUPRA Terramar shines with its Plug-In Hybrid variant, offering a fuel consumption rate as low as 0.4 L/100km and an electric range of 120 km, making it an attractive option for eco-conscious drivers. The CO2 emissions also reflect its efficiency, with some models emitting a mere 10 g/km.
The Skoda Karoq, although not hybrid, offers commendable fuel consumption figures ranging from 4.9 to 6.1 L/100km, depending on the engine choice. CO2 emissions for the Karoq are slightly higher, ranging from 129 to 174 g/km, ultimately labeling it less efficient in comparison to the Terramar. Yet for a traditional combustion engine vehicle, it presents a competitive offering.
When it comes to interior space, both vehicles comfortably accommodate five passengers, yet they differentiate in their overall design philosophy. The CUPRA Terramar features a sporty and modern layout filled with high-quality materials that amplify its performance-oriented character. With a trunk capacity of 450 liters, it provides adequate space for day-to-day use.
The Skoda Karoq, however, scores higher in practicality with its larger trunk capacity of 521 liters, offering more room for luggage or grocery runs. Inside, it boasts a user-friendly infotainment system, standard in modern Skoda vehicles, ensuring drivers can remain connected without distraction.
The driving dynamics of the CUPRA Terramar cater to enthusiasts, with options for both Front-Wheel Drive and All-Wheel Drive configurations. Its adaptive suspension system offers the perfect balance between comfort and sportiness, making it a joy to drive on winding roads.
In contrast, the Skoda Karoq prioritizes comfort and stability over outright performance. Its setup is made to provide a smooth ride, making it ideal for family trips or city commuting. While it occasionally lacks the punch of the Terramar, its handling remains engaging and secure.
Choosing between the CUPRA Terramar and Skoda Karoq ultimately depends on your driving needs and preferences. If you're after a sporty, high-performance SUV with cutting-edge technology and eco-friendly options, the CUPRA Terramar is hard to beat. However, if you prioritize practicality, comfort, and cost-efficiency for family use, the Skoda Karoq remains a stellar choice.
As we move forward, the automotive market continues to evolve, and it's exciting to see how these two models will shape the landscape in the coming years.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Karoq is significantly cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the CUPRA Terramar costs 42,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,900 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the CUPRA Terramar uses 1.6 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Skoda Karoq with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 3.3 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the CUPRA Terramar offers markedly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 190 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the CUPRA Terramar is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the Skoda Karoq takes 7 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the CUPRA Terramar delivers only slightly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Karoq is a bit lighter – 1,380 kg compared to 1,638 kg. The difference is around 258 kg.
Looking at boot space, the CUPRA Terramar offers very slightly more boot space – 540 L compared to 521 L. That’s a difference of about 19 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Karoq carries barely more – 549 kg compared to 542 kg. That’s a difference of about 7 kg.
The CUPRA Terramar holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Skoda Karoq is a smartly packaged compact SUV that balances practical family-friendly space with composed handling, making daily drives feel easy and assured. Its straightforward design, roomy cabin with clever storage solutions, and sensible equipment make it a strong choice for buyers seeking value and versatility without fuss.
details
The CUPRA Terramar blends the brand’s sporty DNA with the practicality of a compact crossover, offering striking design and a driver-focused, premium-feeling cabin. It’s aimed at buyers who want engaging handling and athletic looks without giving up everyday usability and modern connectivity.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,100 - 41,700 £
|
Price
42,000 - 51,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 8.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
118 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
128 - 173 g/km
|
co2
36 - 191 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,655 kg
|
Curb weight
1,638 - 1,904 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
521 L
|
Trunk capacity
450 - 540 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,841 mm
|
Width
1,869 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
456 - 549 kg
|
Payload
512 - 542 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B, G
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
CUPRA
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España