VS

Skoda Karoq vs Ford Tourneo Connect comparison

Compare performance (190 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 27,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Karoq or Ford Tourneo Connect?

Skoda Karoq vs Ford Tourneo Connect: Key differences

Skoda Karoq

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
details

Ford Tourneo Connect

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • considerably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Karoq

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Tourneo Connect is only slightly cheaper – starting at 27,300 £ , while the Skoda Karoq costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,740 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Tourneo Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Skoda Karoq with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 4.4 L/100km.

Tourneo Connect

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Karoq offers clearly more power – delivering 190 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Karoq is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Ford Tourneo Connect takes 10.1 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Karoq delivers only slightly more torque with 360 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

Karoq

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Karoq is slightly lighter – 1,380 kg compared to 1,542 kg. The difference is around 162 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers considerably more boot space – 1,720 L compared to 521 L. That’s a difference of about 1,199 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Tourneo Connect carries clearly more – 818 kg compared to 549 kg. That’s a difference of about 269 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Tourneo Connect is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,300
Tourneo Connect

Ford Tourneo Connect

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 102 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
  • Electric Range 116 - 119 km
Skoda Karoq
Ford Tourneo Connect

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Skoda Karoq

Skoda Karoq is a smartly packaged compact SUV that balances practical family-friendly space with composed handling, making daily drives feel easy and assured. Its straightforward design, roomy cabin with clever storage solutions, and sensible equipment make it a strong choice for buyers seeking value and versatility without fuss.

details

Ford Tourneo Connect

The Ford Tourneo Connect is a practical, surprisingly polished people-mover that balances family-friendly flexibility with car-like driving manners. With clever storage, sliding doors and a bright, airy cabin it’s a smart choice for buyers who want sensible versatility without sacrificing everyday comfort — and it’s oddly enjoyable to drive for its size.

details
Skoda Karoq
Ford Tourneo Connect

Costs and Consumption

Price
29,100 - 41,700 £
Price
27,300 - 41,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
128 - 173 g/km
co2
11 - 164 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,655 kg
Curb weight
1,542 - 1,781 kg
Trunk capacity
521 L
Trunk capacity
1,213 - 1,720 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,841 mm
Width
1,855 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
456 - 549 kg
Payload
563 - 818 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.