@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs Alpine A390 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (265 HP vs 470 HP), boot space and price (36800 £ vs 57900 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Alpine A390?

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Alpine A390

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Kodiaq has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Alpine A390 costs 57900 £. That’s a price difference of around 21009 £.

As for range, the Alpine A390 performs clearly better – achieving up to 555 km, about 432 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A390 has a significantly edge – offering 470 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 205 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A390 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.90 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.30 s. That’s about 2.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs slight better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Alpine A390 tops out at 220 km/h. The difference is around 11 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Alpine A390 pulls clearly stronger with 824 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 424 Nm difference.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is evident lighter – 1684 kg compared to 2121 kg. The difference is around 437 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more room – 910 L compared to 532 L. That’s a difference of about 378 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs distinct better – up to 2105 L, which is about 462 L more than the Alpine A390.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Alpine A390 shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £57,900
default

Alpine A390

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 400 - 470 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.7 - 19.8 kWh
  • Electric Range : 515 - 555 km
Skoda Kodiaq
Alpine A390

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details

Alpine A390

The Alpine A390 is the brand’s leap into the fast electric crossover arena, wrapping Dieppe’s lightweight ethos in a sleek, coupe-ish body with real everyday usability. If the steering and chassis feel echo the A110, this could be the enthusiast’s family EV—subtle, sharp, and très chic, with enough theatre to make the school run feel like a pit lane exit.

details
Skoda Kodiaq
Alpine A390
Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Consumption

Price
36800 - 49600 £
Price
57900 - 66900 £
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 19.8 kWh
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Electric Range
515 - 555 km
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
89 kWh
co2
9 - 186 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Curb weight
2121 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
532 L
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Length
4615 mm
Width
1864 mm
Width
1885 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Height
1532 mm
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Max trunk capacity
1643 L
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
400 - 470 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 4.8 s
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Max Speed
200 - 220 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
661 - 824 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
295 - 345 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Alpine
What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.