VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs KGM Torres comparison

Compare performance (265 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 24,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or KGM Torres?

Skoda Kodiaq vs KGM Torres: Key differences

Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

KGM Torres

  • clearly cheaper
  • a bit lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

KGM Torres is clearly cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,029 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the KGM Torres with 6.1 L/100km. The difference is about 4.6 L/100km.

Torres

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers noticeably more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers noticeably more torque with 400 Nm compared to 280 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm more.

Kodiaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, KGM Torres is a bit lighter – 1,498 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 186 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers noticeably more boot space – 910 L compared to 703 L. That’s a difference of about 207 L.

When it comes to payload, the KGM Torres carries marginally more – 580 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 17 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 119 - 122 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
Skoda Kodiaq
KGM Torres

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Geert
5 May 2026, 08:49:23

The Skoda Kodiac looks sleeker and is bigger. The Ford Explorer is a bit smaller and there was such a fuss made about it, but it’s disappointing in looks and even worse on the inside.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

KGM Torres

The Torres presents a modern, practical take on the SUV, with tidy styling and a focus on day-to-day usability. Its cabin is comfortable and thoughtfully arranged, prioritizing convenience and a composed driving experience.

details
serpimg_yEptnP

Reviews KGM Torres

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and VW Tayron are closely related midsize SUVs that focus on practicality and solid build quality, but they appeal to slightly different tastes and priorities. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the Kodiaq’s family-friendly versatility or the Tayron’s more …
Skoda Kodiaq
MG MGS9
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and the MG MGS9 are both family-sized SUVs that prioritise space and practicality, but they offer contrasting strengths — the Kodiaq leans on refinement and proven engineering, while the MGS9 trades on value and a feature-rich kit. This comparison focuses on interior space, driving …
Skoda Superb Combi
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Skoda Superb Combi is a roomy, practical estate that focuses on comfort and massive luggage space, while the Skoda Kodiaq is a taller, more versatile SUV that suits families needing optional seven-seat flexibility and a higher driving position. Choosing between them comes down to whether you …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Kodiaq target very different buyers: the Enyaq is an all-electric SUV focused on efficiency, modern tech and city-friendly driving, while the Kodiaq is a larger, traditional family SUV offering seven seats, greater towing and cargo capacity. This quick comparison highlights …
Skoda Kodiaq
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the sensible grown-up: roomy, cleverly packaged and quietly refined for family life, while the Dacia Bigster bangs the value drum — massive interior and tough price tag, but fewer niceties. Choose the Kodiaq for long-term polish and smarter detailing; pick the Bigster if you …
KGM Actyon
KGM Torres
VS
KGM Actyon and KGM Torres go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the KGM Actyon or the KGM Torres …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a …
Skoda Kodiaq
KGM Torres

Costs and Consumption
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Price
24,800 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.1 - 9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
35 - 186 g/km
co2
139 - 205 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,670 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
703 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,864 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
552 - 580 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
163 - 204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
280 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
120 - 150 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,497 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, E
Brand
Skoda
Brand
KGM
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Kodiaq have?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.