Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Kodiaq vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (265 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (36800 £ vs 43300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
Kodiaq
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Kodiaq has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6437 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.70 L. The difference is about 2.20 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs convincingly better – achieving up to 122 km, about 62 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a slight edge – offering 269 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 4 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.20 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs minimal better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque tops out at 213 km/h. The difference is around 18 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque pulls evident stronger with 540 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 140 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Kodiaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is slight lighter – 1684 kg compared to 1792 kg. The difference is around 108 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers convincingly more room – 910 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 438 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs decisively better – up to 2105 L, which is about 949 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque slight takes the win – 600 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 37 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £36,800
Skoda Kodiaq
Skoda Kodiaq
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
1 (1 Reviews)
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
Price
43300 - 64800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
|
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 67 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
Curb weight
1792 - 2157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
Length
4371 mm
|
|
Width
1864 mm
|
Width
1900 mm
|
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
Height
1649 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1156 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
Max Speed
190 - 213 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?
The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.