Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Kodiaq vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison
Compare performance (265 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
Skoda Kodiaq vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Kodiaq
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Kodiaq is somewhat cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,408 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more range – reaching up to 122 km, about 55 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers barely more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 4 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.2 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque delivers clearly more torque with 540 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 140 Nm more.
Kodiaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is very slightly lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 108 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers substantially more boot space – 910 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 438 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries marginally more – 600 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 37 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Kodiaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £37,900
Skoda Kodiaq
Skoda Kodiaq
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Kodiaq
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
Electric Range
60 - 67 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
4,758 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
|
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
226 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.