Compare performance (265 HP vs 280 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 36,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Lynk & Co 01?
In the bustling world of SUVs, the market is flooded with options catering to varying tastes and requirements. Today, we pit two contenders in the SUV arena against each other: the versatile Skoda Kodiaq and the innovative Lynk & Co 01. Both vehicles come with intriguing specs and features that cater to tech-savvy and performance-focused drivers.
Power and efficiency are at the forefront for both SUVs. The Skoda Kodiaq showcases an array of engine types, including plugin hybrid, petrol MHEV, diesel, and petrol variants. Its most powerful configuration offers an impressive 265 HP, allowing swift acceleration with a best 0-100 km/h time of 6.3 seconds. Meanwhile, the Lynk & Co 01 Golf sticks with plugin hybrid engines, generating up to 276 HP, and achieving a competitive acceleration time of 7.7 seconds.
Both vehicles employ automatic, dual-clutch transmissions ensuring smooth gear shifts, yet the Kodiaq offers a choice between front-wheel and all-wheel drive, providing more flexibility off-road or in adverse weather conditions. The Lynk & Co 01 keeps things straightforward with front-wheel drive.
In the eco-conscious era, fuel efficiency and emissions are key. The Kodiaq’s plugin hybrid variant achieves remarkable consumption as low as 0.4 L/100km with an electric range of up to 123 km, perfect for city commutes. Its CO2 emissions range from 9 to 186 g/km across its different engine types.
The Lynk & Co 01 prioritizes sustainability with a slightly higher fuel consumption at 0.9 L/100km and an electric range of 75 km. It maintains a favorable CO2 efficiency class of B, with emissions as low as 20 g/km, making it an attractive option for environmentally-conscious buyers.
Comfort in an SUV is paramount, and the Kodiaq’s spacious cabin reflects this, offering generous trunk space up to 910 liters and seating for five. Its curb weight varies between 1,661 to 1,859 kg, indicating its robust build and potential for spacious interiors.
Lynk & Co 01 also fulfills the family-SUV requirement, albeit offering a more compact trunk capacity of 466 liters. The weight of up to 1,973 kg and dimensions hint at a well-insulated, high-quality interior designed for comfort during longer drives.
With dimensions stretching 4,758 mm in length, the Kodiaq presents a slightly larger profile compared to the Lynk & Co’s 4,545 mm. The broader stance of the Kodiaq provides more command on the road, while Lynk & Co's relatively compact design adds to its maneuverability in urban settings.
The design ethos of both brands strikes a balance between robustness and elegance, with Skoda’s more traditional SUV look versus Lynk & Co’s modern, tech-savvy aesthetic appeal.
Both vehicles are equipped with the latest tech features, enhancing the driving experience. From digital cockpits to connectivity suites, these vehicles align well with modern drivers’ expectations. The Kodiaq provides more options with its diverse engine selection and driving configurations, while the Lynk & Co offers a specialized, eco-friendly hybrid experience.
In conclusion, the choice between the Skoda Kodiaq and the Lynk & Co 01 largely depends on personal needs: whether one values versatility and power options or seeks a stylish, efficient hybrid SUV. Either way, both vehicles stand out in the competitive SUV market with unique offerings.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Lynk & Co 01 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 36,900 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,025 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Lynk & Co 01 uses 0.9 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Skoda Kodiaq with 1.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq offers visibly more range – reaching up to 122 km, about 47 km more than the Lynk & Co 01.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 01 offers only slightly more power – delivering 280 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 15 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Lynk & Co 01 takes 7.7 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Lynk & Co 01 delivers noticeably more torque with 535 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 135 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is moderately lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 1,935 kg. The difference is around 251 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers significantly more boot space – 910 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 444 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries markedly more – 563 kg compared to 415 kg. That’s a difference of about 148 kg.
The Lynk & Co 01 holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
The Lynk & Co 01 marries bold, contemporary styling with a roomy, well-appointed cabin, striking a rare balance between fashionable flair and everyday practicality. With intuitive tech, flexible ownership ideas and a playful driving character, it’s the kind of crossover that turns heads at the lights and keeps owners grinning on the commute.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
Price
36,900 - 40,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
Electric Range
75 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
co2
20 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
Curb weight
1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
|
Length
4,758 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
415 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
280 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
226 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
535 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
206 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Lynk & Co
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España