VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs Maserati MCPURA Coupe comparison

Compare performance (265 HP vs 630 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 210,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Maserati MCPURA Coupe?

Skoda Kodiaq vs Maserati MCPURA Coupe: Key differences

Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • substantially more trunk space
details

Maserati MCPURA Coupe

  • clearly more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Kodiaq is clearly cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the Maserati MCPURA Coupe costs 210,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 172,123 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Maserati MCPURA Coupe with 11.5 L/100km. The difference is about 10 L/100km.

MCPURA Coupe

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Maserati MCPURA Coupe offers clearly more power – delivering 630 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 365 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Maserati MCPURA Coupe is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 2.9 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.3 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Maserati MCPURA Coupe delivers substantially more torque with 730 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 330 Nm more.

Kodiaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Skoda Kodiaq offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Maserati MCPURA Coupe is slightly lighter – 1,469 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 215 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers substantially more boot space – 910 L compared to 100 L. That’s a difference of about 810 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries significantly more – 563 kg compared to 321 kg. That’s a difference of about 242 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plug-in Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 119 - 122 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Superb Combi
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Skoda Superb Combi is a roomy, practical estate that focuses on comfort and massive luggage space, while the Skoda Kodiaq is a taller, more versatile SUV that suits families needing optional seven-seat flexibility and a higher driving position. Choosing between them comes down to whether you …
Ford Kuga
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Ford Kuga and Skoda Kodiaq are two popular midsize SUVs that balance everyday practicality with family-friendly space and efficient powertrains. This comparison focuses on driving dynamics, interior room, tech and running costs so you can quickly see which suits your priorities best.
Skoda Kodiaq
Maserati MCPURA Coupe

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
Geert
5 May 2026, 08:49:23

The Skoda Kodiac looks sleeker and is bigger. The Ford Explorer is a bit smaller and there was such a fuss made about it, but it’s disappointing in looks and even worse on the inside.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Maserati MCPURA Coupe

The Maserati MCPURA Coupe represents a harmonious blend of luxurious elegance and sporty dynamics, making it a standout in the realm of high-end automobiles. Its sleek, aerodynamic design is complemented by an interior that exudes opulence, ensuring a comfortable yet exhilarating ride. As a quintessential symbol of Italian craftsmanship, the MCPURA Coupe captivates those who value sophistication and performance in equal measure.

details
serpimg_IxaESX

Reviews Maserati MCPURA Coupe

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
Skoda Kodiaq
Jaecoo 7
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and Jaecoo 7 are midsize SUVs aimed at families, but they're very different — the Kodiaq emphasizes European refinement, practicality and proven driving dynamics, while the Jaecoo 7 undercuts on price with generous tech and equipment from a newer Chinese brand. This comparison …
Skoda Kodiaq
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and the Mitsubishi Outlander both aim at buyers needing a practical, family-friendly SUV, but they take different approaches—Kodiaq prioritizes space and refinement, while Outlander leans on value and versatility. This comparison highlights the strengths and trade-offs so you can …
Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Skoda Kodiaq comes down to whether you value driving finesse and cabin refinement or space and practicality. The CX-5 shines with engaging handling and an upscale interior, while the Kodiaq offers more passenger room, flexible seating and strong …
Audi Q5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Audi Q5 prowls the compact-luxury segment with silky engines, a refined cabin and tech that makes every commute feel a size class upscale — it’s for buyers who want polish and badge appeal. The Skoda Kodiaq, bigger and far more practical, stuffs in three rows, acres of boot space and a sensible …
Skoda Kodiaq
Maserati MCPURA Coupe

Costs and Consumption
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Price
210,000 £
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
11.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
35 - 186 g/km
co2
261 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Coupe
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Curb weight
1,469 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
100 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,864 mm
Width
1,965 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
321 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plug-in Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
630 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
730 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
6
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
463 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
3,000 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Maserati
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Kodiaq have?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.