VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs SsangYong Rexton - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (265 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (36800 £ vs 41100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or SsangYong Rexton?

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

SsangYong Rexton

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate

You can find all user reviews further down on this page.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Kodiaq has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £ , while the SsangYong Rexton costs 41100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4286 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the SsangYong Rexton with 8.20 L. The difference is about 6.70 L per 100 km.

Rexton

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a evident edge – offering 265 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 63 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.60 s. That’s about 4.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs a bit better – reaching 226 km/h, while the SsangYong Rexton tops out at 184 km/h. The difference is around 42 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: SsangYong Rexton pulls minimal stronger with 441 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 41 Nm difference.

Kodiaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: SsangYong Rexton offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is noticeable lighter – 1684 kg compared to 2145 kg. The difference is around 461 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers to a small extent more room – 910 L compared to 784 L. That’s a difference of about 126 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs minimal better – up to 2105 L, which is about 128 L more than the SsangYong Rexton.

When it comes to payload, SsangYong Rexton noticeable takes the win – 770 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 207 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Skoda Kodiaq
SsangYong Rexton

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £36,800
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.2 L
  • Electric Range : 119 - 122 km
details

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

SsangYong Rexton

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate

The SsangYong Rexton is a no-nonsense full-size SUV that pairs rugged, go-anywhere bones with a surprisingly plush cabin, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want capability without premium-brand prices. It won’t turn heads like a luxury badge, but its generous space, sensible features and honest practicality make it a smart, down-to-earth family hauler — a savvy pick if you value substance over status.

details
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Frontansicht_1_300dpi
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Heckansicht_300dpi
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Seitenansicht_300dpi
1_SsangYong_neuer_Rexton_2020_300dpi
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Innenansicht_1_300dpi

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Reviews SsangYong Rexton

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
Frank Williams CPA/ ACCA/ CPD
22 Jan 2026, 01:20:01

Ssang Yong Rexton is better than the Land Cruiser

Top Car Comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
Skoda Kodiaq
SsangYong Rexton

Costs and Consumption
Price
36800 - 50600 £
Price
41100 - 51300 £
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
Consumption L/100km
8.20 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
35 - 186 g/km
co2
214 - 216 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
70 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Curb weight
2145 - 2180 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
Length
4758 mm
Length
4850 mm
Width
1864 mm
Width
1960 mm
Height
1679 - 1683 mm
Height
1825 mm
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
Max trunk capacity
1806 - 1977 L
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
655 - 770 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
202 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.60 s
Max Speed
205 - 226 km/h
Max Speed
184 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
441 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
148 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
2157 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2021 - 2023
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Skoda
Brand
SsangYong

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a …
Audi Q5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Audi Q5 prowls the compact-luxury segment with silky engines, a refined cabin and tech that makes every commute feel a size class upscale — it’s for buyers who want polish and badge appeal. The Skoda Kodiaq, bigger and far more practical, stuffs in three rows, acres of boot space and a sensible …
Skoda Kodiaq
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the sensible grown-up: roomy, cleverly packaged and quietly refined for family life, while the Dacia Bigster bangs the value drum — massive interior and tough price tag, but fewer niceties. Choose the Kodiaq for long-term polish and smarter detailing; pick the Bigster if you …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of mid-size SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq stands out with its impressive space and practicality, making it an ideal choice for families and those needing extra cargo capacity. On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 boasts a luxurious interior and advanced safety features that focus on a premium …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Skoda Kodiaq and the VW Touran, both models showcase exceptional versatility but cater to slightly different audiences. The Kodiaq, with its bold SUV design and spacious three-row seating, is perfect for families and adventure seekers, while the Touran offers a …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.