Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Kodiaq vs SsangYong Rexton comparison
Compare performance (265 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 41,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or SsangYong Rexton?
Kodiaq
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Kodiaq is marginally cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the SsangYong Rexton costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,257 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the SsangYong Rexton with 8.2 L/100km. The difference is about 6.7 L/100km.
Rexton
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers markedly more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 63 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.6 s. That’s about 4.3 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq is moderately faster – reaching 226 km/h, while the SsangYong Rexton tops out at 184 km/h. The difference is around 42 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the SsangYong Rexton delivers barely more torque with 441 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 41 Nm more.
Kodiaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: SsangYong Rexton offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is markedly lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 2,145 kg. The difference is around 461 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers a bit more boot space – 910 L compared to 784 L. That’s a difference of about 126 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq offers only slightly more capacity – up to 2,105 L, about 128 L more than the SsangYong Rexton.
When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Rexton carries clearly more – 770 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 207 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Kodiaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £37,900
Skoda Kodiaq
Skoda Kodiaq
SsangYong Rexton
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Kodiaq
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
SsangYong Rexton
The SsangYong Rexton is a no-nonsense full-size SUV that pairs rugged, go-anywhere bones with a surprisingly plush cabin, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want capability without premium-brand prices. It won’t turn heads like a luxury badge, but its generous space, sensible features and honest practicality make it a smart, down-to-earth family hauler — a savvy pick if you value substance over status.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
SsangYong Rexton
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
Price
41,100 - 51,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
8.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
co2
214 - 216 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
Curb weight
2,145 - 2,180 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
|
|
Length
4,758 mm
|
Length
4,850 mm
|
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
Width
1,960 mm
|
|
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
|
Height
1,825 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,806 - 1,977 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
655 - 770 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
202 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
226 km/h
|
Max Speed
184 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
441 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
148 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,023
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
SsangYong
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.