@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility
VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs SsangYong Rexton - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (265 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (36800 £ vs 41100 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or SsangYong Rexton?

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

SsangYong Rexton

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Kodiaq has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the SsangYong Rexton costs 41100 £. That’s a price difference of around 4286 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the SsangYong Rexton with 8.20 L. The difference is about 7.80 L per 100 km.

Rexton @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a evident edge – offering 265 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 63 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.60 s. That’s about 4.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs noticeable better – reaching 231 km/h, while the SsangYong Rexton tops out at 184 km/h. The difference is around 47 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: SsangYong Rexton pulls minimal stronger with 441 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 41 Nm difference.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: SsangYong Rexton offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is noticeable lighter – 1684 kg compared to 2145 kg. The difference is around 461 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers to a small extent more room – 910 L compared to 784 L. That’s a difference of about 126 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs minimal better – up to 2105 L, which is about 128 L more than the SsangYong Rexton.

When it comes to payload, SsangYong Rexton noticeable takes the win – 770 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 207 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £36,800
Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.4 - 8.2 L
  • Electric Range : 113 - 123 km
Skoda Kodiaq
SsangYong Rexton

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details

SsangYong Rexton

The SsangYong Rexton is a no-nonsense full-size SUV that pairs rugged, go-anywhere bones with a surprisingly plush cabin, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want capability without premium-brand prices. It won’t turn heads like a luxury badge, but its generous space, sensible features and honest practicality make it a smart, down-to-earth family hauler — a savvy pick if you value substance over status.

details
Skoda Kodiaq
SsangYong Rexton
Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Rexton @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility

Costs and Consumption

Price
36800 - 49600 £
Price
41100 - 51300 £
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption L/100km
8.20 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
9 - 186 g/km
co2
214 - 216 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
70 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Curb weight
2145 - 2180 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Length
4850 mm
Width
1864 mm
Width
1960 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Height
1825 mm
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Max trunk capacity
1806 - 1977 L
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
655 - 770 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
202 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.60 s
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Max Speed
184 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
441 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
148 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
2157 cm3

General

Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2021 - 2023
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Skoda
Brand
SsangYong
What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.