Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Kodiaq vs VW Caddy Compact Van - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (265 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (36800 £ vs 25800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or VW Caddy Compact Van?
Kodiaq
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
VW Caddy Compact Van has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25800 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11027 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW Caddy Compact Van manages with 0.50 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Skoda Kodiaq with 1.50 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs slight better – achieving up to 122 km, about 2 km more than the VW Caddy Compact Van.
Caddy Compact Van
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a decisively edge – offering 265 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs somewhat better – reaching 226 km/h, while the VW Caddy Compact Van tops out at 186 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls to a small extent stronger with 400 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm difference.
Kodiaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Skoda Kodiaq offers significantly more seating capacity – 5 vs 2.
In curb weight, VW Caddy Compact Van is slightly lighter – 1442 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 242 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the VW Caddy Compact Van performs convincingly better – up to 3700 L, which is about 1595 L more than the Skoda Kodiaq.
When it comes to payload, VW Caddy Compact Van noticeable takes the win – 759 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 196 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The VW Caddy Compact Van is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Caddy Compact Van
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £25,800
VW Caddy Compact Van
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (4 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
VW Caddy Compact Van
The VW Caddy is a clever compact van that turns urban chores into something almost enjoyable, thanks to smart packaging and a cabin that refuses to feel like punishment. For buyers who want useful practicality without drama, the Caddy is a tidy, dependable choice that quietly gets the job done while remaining surprisingly pleasant to drive.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Caddy Compact Van
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36800 - 50600 £
|
Price
25800 - 42300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
Electric Range
117 - 120 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
co2
11 - 154 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
Curb weight
1442 - 1818 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4758 mm
|
Length
4500 - 4853 mm
|
|
Width
1864 mm
|
Width
1855 mm
|
|
Height
1679 - 1683 mm
|
Height
1819 - 1823 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3100 - 3700 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
628 - 759 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
205 - 226 km/h
|
Max Speed
175 - 186 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 320 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
VW
|
What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?
The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.